I think this is possible, but don't want to assume:
PB1 -----> PBC <----- PB2
PB1 and PB2 both sync their backups to the same datastore on PBC for DR purposes.
I assume PBC would gain additional dedupe from PB1 and PB2 being combined and take less storage than PB1 + PB2?
As primarily a remote replication target, could PBC possibly get by with less IO (ie: use HDD instead of SSD), or is it as IOPs intensive and/or IOPs needed in case of restores?
PB1 -----> PBC <----- PB2
PB1 and PB2 both sync their backups to the same datastore on PBC for DR purposes.
I assume PBC would gain additional dedupe from PB1 and PB2 being combined and take less storage than PB1 + PB2?
As primarily a remote replication target, could PBC possibly get by with less IO (ie: use HDD instead of SSD), or is it as IOPs intensive and/or IOPs needed in case of restores?