So wondering what proxmox is doing here. VM101 is a windows-11 VM that I do not have set to start on reboot and do not have running. I.e. I only enable this VM when I want to use it otherwise I have it shut down. It looks as though when CRON jobs are run its expecting something back from VM101 and since its shutdown creating an error. What is proxmox doing here?
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd[1]: Started 101.scope.
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd-udevd[10272]: Using default interface naming scheme 'v247'.
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd-udevd[10272]: ethtool: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: device tap101i0 entered promiscuous mode
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered blocking state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered disabled state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered blocking state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered forwarding state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: <root@pam> end task UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002815:0003D12E:64732928:qmstart:101:root@pam: OK
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 2/KVM/10307 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 12/KVM/10317 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 1/KVM/10306 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 5/KVM/10310 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 26/KVM/10331 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 24/KVM/10329 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 27/KVM/10332 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 25/KVM/10330 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 4/KVM/10309 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 15/KVM/10320 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:59 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[10336]: starting vnc proxy UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002860:0003D242:6473292B:vncproxy:101:root@pam:
May 28 03:12:59 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: <root@pam> starting task UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002860:0003D242:6473292B:vncproxy:101:root@pam:
May 28 03:13:00 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1413]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:19 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:38 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:57 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:16 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:35 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:54 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:15:04 HOME-SERVER kernel: split_lock_warn: 16 callbacks suppressed
May 28 03:15:04 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 0/KVM/10305 took a split_lock trap at address: 0xfffff800360b248f
May 28 03:15:13 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:15:32 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd[1]: Started 101.scope.
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd-udevd[10272]: Using default interface naming scheme 'v247'.
May 28 03:12:56 HOME-SERVER systemd-udevd[10272]: ethtool: autonegotiation is unset or enabled, the speed and duplex are not writable.
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: device tap101i0 entered promiscuous mode
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered blocking state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered disabled state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered blocking state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: vmbr0: port 3(tap101i0) entered forwarding state
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: <root@pam> end task UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002815:0003D12E:64732928:qmstart:101:root@pam: OK
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 2/KVM/10307 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 12/KVM/10317 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 1/KVM/10306 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 5/KVM/10310 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 26/KVM/10331 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 24/KVM/10329 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 27/KVM/10332 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 25/KVM/10330 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 4/KVM/10309 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:57 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 15/KVM/10320 took a split_lock trap at address: 0x7ed9d050
May 28 03:12:59 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[10336]: starting vnc proxy UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002860:0003D242:6473292B:vncproxy:101:root@pam:
May 28 03:12:59 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: <root@pam> starting task UPID:HOME-SERVER:00002860:0003D242:6473292B:vncproxy:101:root@pam:
May 28 03:13:00 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1413]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:19 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:38 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:13:57 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:16 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:35 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:14:54 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:15:04 HOME-SERVER kernel: split_lock_warn: 16 callbacks suppressed
May 28 03:15:04 HOME-SERVER kernel: x86/split lock detection: #AC: CPU 0/KVM/10305 took a split_lock trap at address: 0xfffff800360b248f
May 28 03:15:13 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1415]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout
May 28 03:15:32 HOME-SERVER pvedaemon[1414]: VM 101 qmp command failed - VM 101 qmp command 'guest-ping' failed - got timeout