Hi!
We are currently implementing a secondary 2 link for corosync and when reading the documentation it says that the secondary ring (ring with lower priority) wont see any traffic unless all higher priorities have failed.
In our case we the have majority of our servers connected to one switch which is used by primary ring and I was wondering in the case that the switch goes down for maintenance, shouldn't corosync secondary link become the active link for the cluster?
Looking forward for your response.
Thanks!
We are currently implementing a secondary 2 link for corosync and when reading the documentation it says that the secondary ring (ring with lower priority) wont see any traffic unless all higher priorities have failed.
Code:
# cat /etc/pve/corosync.conf
logging {
debug: off
to_syslog: yes
}
nodelist {
node {
name: pve-01
nodeid: 1
quorum_votes: 1
ring0_addr: 10.100.0.xxx
ring1_addr: 10.200.0.xxx
}
node {
name: pve-02
nodeid: 2
quorum_votes: 1
ring0_addr: 10.100.0.xxx
ring1_addr: 10.200.0.xxx
}
node {
name: pve-03
nodeid: 3
quorum_votes: 1
ring0_addr: 10.100.0.xxx
ring1_addr: 10.200.0.xxx
}
}
quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}
totem {
cluster_name: pve_cluster01
config_version: 6
interface {
linknumber: 0
}
interface {
linknumber: 1
}
ip_version: ipv4
secauth: on
version: 2
}
In our case we the have majority of our servers connected to one switch which is used by primary ring and I was wondering in the case that the switch goes down for maintenance, shouldn't corosync secondary link become the active link for the cluster?
Looking forward for your response.
Thanks!
Last edited: