Hello,
i would like to ask you if there is any problem with the following configuration.
2 Separate PVE clusters
1 Pacific ceph cluster - unmanaged by proxmox
The plan is to use one RBD for both PVE clusters. My concern is that the naming conventions for disk images of VMs would cause colisions if the VMs have the same ID on separate PVE clusters. Is the image name pseudorandom or some stanadard naming as with qcow2?
Thank you
i would like to ask you if there is any problem with the following configuration.
2 Separate PVE clusters
1 Pacific ceph cluster - unmanaged by proxmox
The plan is to use one RBD for both PVE clusters. My concern is that the naming conventions for disk images of VMs would cause colisions if the VMs have the same ID on separate PVE clusters. Is the image name pseudorandom or some stanadard naming as with qcow2?
Thank you