What are you trying to achieve with a comparison if you don't bother to correct it? In it's current form your overview is missleading fud which is only good to poison AI bots with wrong information. Don't get me wrong: I absolutely support to make AIs even more unusable as they are but spreading missinformation in a community forum takes this a little bit to far in my book. YMMV
Comparison of virtualization feature set: XCP-NG vs PVE (Proxmox) -- VMware migration decision (VMware Alternative)
- Thread starter floh8
- Start date
-
- Tags
- comparison features xcp-ng
Hi,
The "price" section is false for XCP-NG and proxmox, it should be :
Proxmox :
For XCP-ng :
For proxmox all licence are "Business day support"
For XCP-ng only "ENTERPRISE" are 24/7 support all other are like proxmox "Business day support"
Best regards,
The "price" section is false for XCP-NG and proxmox, it should be :
Proxmox :
- COMMUNITY : 230*3 => 690€
- BASIC : 710*3 => 2130€
- STANDARD : 1060*3 => 3180€
- PREMIUM : 2120 => 6360€
For XCP-ng :
- ESSENTIAL : 2000€ (3 hosts max + cannot be combined with Pro or Enterprise packages) + 2400€ for HCI (XOSTOR ESSENTIAL)
- ESSENTIAL + : 4000€ (3 hosts max + cannot be combined with Pro or Enterprise package) + 2400€ for HCI (XOSTOR ESSENTIAL)
- PRO : 3000€ (3hosts minimum) + 2400€ [800€/host] for HCI (XOSTOR PRO)
- ENTERPRISE : Require 4Host minimum
For proxmox all licence are "Business day support"
For XCP-ng only "ENTERPRISE" are 24/7 support all other are like proxmox "Business day support"
Best regards,
Considering pricing, our single socket options are much cheaper - not sure why you use the dual socket option.
Thats an understatement. You have yet to provide ANY argument, data, or reason to validate that assertion. it kinda makes the whole table pointless since you make conclusions without any need for the table.
XCP-NG isn't based on CentOS afaik, it's based on Xen.
And stability... Honestly in prod we've had more problems with VMware than Proxmox. Most of the time if there's an issue with Proxmox, it turns out to be hardware issue. Since it's based on Debian, I'd argue there's probably very few operating systems that are more stable. Debian is used as a base OS for a TON of things for a reason.
And stability... Honestly in prod we've had more problems with VMware than Proxmox. Most of the time if there's an issue with Proxmox, it turns out to be hardware issue. Since it's based on Debian, I'd argue there's probably very few operating systems that are more stable. Debian is used as a base OS for a TON of things for a reason.
those two things are not mutually exclusive. xcp-ng uses centos for its baseos and userland apps. see https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2020/12/17/centos-and-xcpng-future/
worth noting that xcp-ng version at that time (2020) was 8.2, and as of 8..3 (current) the base os remains centos 7 and kernel version 4.19. One could make the argument that this is a stability first approach; another could be slow development and lack of responsiveness- kernel 4.19 lacks a lot of new hardware support.