Hi,
My cluster consists of 4 nodes (Dell R440)
Networks :
192.168.38.0/24 (private network for vms)
193.49.x.y (public network for vms)
The vms communicate perfectly on the first three nodes with an external physical server (public network).
But the physical server fails to "ping" a vm that is on the fourth node (one public network card for each 193.49.x.y).
The fourth node is configured in the same way as the first three.
However, when I ping the physical server from the vm of the fourth node, the connection initializes with difficulty
(cf response time):
********************************************
root@nas-pve-prod:~# ping 193.49.x.y
PING 193.49.x.y (193.49.x.y) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2112 ms
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1088 ms
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=64.2 ms
********************************************
The ping then works from the physical server to the vm of the fourth node.
Have you encountered this problem before?
Thanking you for your answers.
Yours sincerely,
My cluster consists of 4 nodes (Dell R440)
Networks :
192.168.38.0/24 (private network for vms)
193.49.x.y (public network for vms)
The vms communicate perfectly on the first three nodes with an external physical server (public network).
But the physical server fails to "ping" a vm that is on the fourth node (one public network card for each 193.49.x.y).
The fourth node is configured in the same way as the first three.
However, when I ping the physical server from the vm of the fourth node, the connection initializes with difficulty
(cf response time):
********************************************
root@nas-pve-prod:~# ping 193.49.x.y
PING 193.49.x.y (193.49.x.y) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2112 ms
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1088 ms
64 bytes from 193.49.201.164: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=64.2 ms
********************************************
The ping then works from the physical server to the vm of the fourth node.
Have you encountered this problem before?
Thanking you for your answers.
Yours sincerely,