You would be well advised to move your Qdevice to a local raspberry pi, or even a Virtualbox VM running on your desktop - as long as it's on 24/7.
Clearly you have not tested a DR situation, you don't want a Qdevice in the cloud somewhere and unreachable if things go sideways.
And as leesteken mentioned, you should seriously consider unclustering if most of your infrastructure is powered off -- cluster is designed for HA and failover. You can run stuff on separate nodes easily with backup and restore, and manage different nodes from separate tabs in the browser.
Such a configuration would not make technical sense, therefor it has not been tested, and that means it's not supported.My question is if we can actually have 2 qdevices, is that actually supported?
I disagree that it wouldn't make technical sense but thanks anyway.Such a configuration would not make technical sense, therefor it has not been tested, and that means it's not supported.
Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
My understanding is that you put the 2nd qdevice with 2 votes, and the other with 1 vote hoping for an odd number with your 2 node cluster.I have a kind of weird setup currently, it's a temporary setup until I have time to do it properly.
1 Main node with a virtualised firewall and other essential services, 2 other proxmox nodes that aren't always online to save energy and other reasons. I have also a qdevice setup on a cloud vm that connect home using a vpn. If the other 2 nodes go down it's all good as I have the qdevice on the cloud vm, however, if the vpn link is served I cannot start the virtualised firewall as the qdevice is unreachable hence no quorum. So, for a short time, I want to add a lxc container with a qdevice, just to be sure the VMs on the main node can start and provide connectivity to the remove qdevice.
I know isn't a pretty setup, but that's the setup I want for now.
Any help?