Search results

Hey everyone, I've got a VM running a site to site VPN which is a backup to a physical connection handled by a hardware router. As a result of this, the traffic passing via the internal interface may be asymmetrical, or existing connections created over the physical backhaul connection may at...

Great to know I'm not crazy, lol. Thanks so much for investigating!

I've been testing out the newer nftables-based firewall, and outside of the (very annoying) syntax changes for iplists/aliases, it seems to be working well. However, I noticed an issue when configuring a VM that has three network interfaces. Only two of the three interfaces have the firewall...

How exactly should we be checking that our DNS is valid? I've been unable to get migration working between any of my clusters, anywhere. It's always this error. I can SSH between the domain names of the clusters, they all have valid letsencrypt certificates, etc. The logs are pretty much...

I get the same 501 issue and I used the password method. Did you install PDM from ISO or did you install via the repository? Because I installed on a Debian Bookworm system using the repository.

Yes, all of my nodes that I have tested are running PVE 8.3.2. All of them have the latest packages installed. Some of them are licensed, others are no-subscription. I cannot find any combination of anything that appears to work. I did dive into the code a bit, and I've tried intentionally...

Following up on this, I can see pveproxy on the source remote returning 501 in the access.log: "POST /api2/extjs/nodes/prox-cpu1/lxc/105/remote_migrate HTTP/1.1" 501 - When I use pvesh to query the available methods for the above resource, there's no `remote_migrate` endpoint. root@prox-cpu1:~#...

Interesting. Is there a way I can try to verify that? Running dig from both sides against each others' hostnames seems to be working as expected.

I seem to be having trouble migrating a VM between clusters, getting the error message "api error (status = 501 Not Implemented)" when I click migrate. The VM is offline, and the source and destination clusters are using Ceph. Host nodes both have Community subscriptions, and I've made sure that...

Hi all, I'm in a situation where I'm being heavily bottlenecked by my PBS's TLS speed. I'm running PBS as a VM on a Synology RS1221RP+, and when I run a benchmark against the repository, the TLS speed is the clear bottleneck. Additionally, the CPU usage of the PBS vm gets pinned to 100% during...

Howdy, So we've got a relatively small CEPH NVMe cluster consisting of 4x nodes, each with a Samsung datacenter 3.8TB M.2 SSD inside. Each node has 4x 10g connections, 2x in LACP for normal traffic, 2x in LACP for CEPH traffic. Connected using a pair of S4048-ON switches. We're looking at...

Ah yep now I see it, thanks!

What's the interface for the new taskset CPU pinning? I'm not seeing anything new in the web interface right now.

Aug 25 01:55:18 prox-gpu2 pvedaemon[393777]: <root@pam!dispatcher_worker> starting task UPID:prox-gpu2:0006D3DD:0093B3F0:630738F6:qmstart:9005:root@pam!dispatcher_worker: Aug 25 01:55:18 prox-gpu2 pvedaemon[447453]: start VM 9005...

Yes, all of my code waits for the command to finish. Here's the full error it gives me: failed to stat '/mnt/pve/optanestor/images/9005/vm-9005-cloudinit.qcow2' TASK ERROR: disk image '/mnt/pve/optanestor/images/9005/vm-9005-cloudinit.qcow2' already exists Hmm, alright. How can I get that UPID...

I think I might be in the wrong here. For context, this is my process: - Create VM via API, wait via polling UPID - Call custom API connector on node which uses `qm set` to apply the instance metadata - Start VM via API, wait via polling UPID (this is where things fail, with the `already exists`...

I've been experiencing what I believe to be the same issue, except I can replicate it reliably. I'm creating a VM via the API, configuring it, then starting it, and my start tasks fail semi-regularly. I can reduce the chances of it happening by using a 5 second delay, but this is suboptimal as...

That's not quite what I'm asking. I'm asking whether I should attach my `vlan20` interface to `vmbr0` or `bond0`. Both configurations seem to work, but I haven't been able to find any documentation on possible issues with having a vlan *and* a bridge attached to one interface (bond0).

Hello, So I've got a few servers where they are connected to our ethernet switch via an LACP bond. It's basically like: vmbr0 (vlan aware) -> bond0 -> eno1, eno2 We need to add a vlan interface in order to access our storage network VLAN on the bond. My question is, do I attach the vlan...

Braindead moment. Someone assigned a machine to that management IP and didn't document it, causing an IP conflict. Changed that machine's IP and everything works great now.