Search results

Thank you for your reply. Yes, I did restart everything. Now there is a small progress. As I mentioned in the first post, I was able to change the public network to 10.10.111.0/24. I was unable to change the cluster network to 10.10.112.0/24. BUT when I tried to change the cluster network from...

Hi guys, I am trying to change Ceph networks. Since now I had one subnet (172.16.254.0/24) both for public and cluster network. The goal is to have this configuration: cluster_network = 10.10.112.0/24 public_network = 10.10.111.0/24 I have followed this tutorial...

Silimar problem is when you create permission to user for particular VMID. This remains valid after you delete server and that user has access to completely different server when the VMID is reused :( Not to mention that we are trying to pair VMID to billing to another system and it creates...

Hi, # pveceph status cluster: id: ecc963a4-009f-4236-87fe-e672a7cb5d49 health: HEALTH_OK services: mon: 5 daemons, quorum node97,node98,node99,node2,node1 (age 4d) mgr: node2(active, since 4d), standbys: node99, node97, node98, node4 mds: XXX:1 YYY:1...

# ceph --version ceph version 14.2.16 (5d5ae817209e503a412040d46b3374855b7efe04) nautilus (stable) # pveceph pool ls ┌────────────────────┬──────┬──────────┬────────┬───────────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────────────┬────────────────┐ │ Name │ Size │ Min Size │ PG Num │...

Hi everyone, I'm using latest proxmox (6.3) and experiencing strange issue during live migration of KVM machines running on ceph block storage (ceph cluster was created through proxmox). Cluster is running fine for several years (was prevously on proxmox 5). This issue started only lately, I...

Hi Wolfgang, thanks for reply. I tried even the incognito mode, same result. Unfortunately the only thing that "resolves" the problem is reboot of all nodes (so I'm doing that one by one).

Hi, I have added a new node into existing 11-node cluster. The new node correctly shows on "pvecm status" on all nodes. I can also see it on " pvesh get cluster/config/nodes" (on all nodes). But I cannot see it on the webgui on the left side - when I connect to the GUI on all existing nodes, I...

I understand. But none of CPUs (threads) are utilized on 100 %. Even during the fio tests all threads on all CPUs have load like this: %Cpu0 : 27.0 us, 2.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 69.9 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.3 si, 0.0 st

I tried to set noout flag and stopped all OSDs on the slowest node, fio results were the same.

Thank you for this tip. How did you identified the problematic VM? None of my VMs is using 100% CPU or making excessive disk read/write (according to graph available in proxmox).

First of all, thank you for your time. fio --name=randwrite --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=64 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --direct=1 --size=512M --runtime=60 Way better: Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][r=0KiB/s,w=27.6MiB/s][r=0,w=7073 IOPS][eta 00m:00s] Jobs: 1 (f=1)...

So you think that I should raise number of PGs for the main pool from 512 to 1024?

fio is IMHO very bad with small block size. It gets better with increasing BS, fio --name=randwrite --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=1 --rw=randwrite --bs=4k --direct=0 --size=512M --numjobs=8 --runtime=60 --group_reporting I have experienced one bigger hang for a couple of seconds on the VM...

Plain Supermicro boards, no external HBA (most of the nodes are running on INTEL C622 https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/xeon/C620/X11DDW-NT.cfm).

Hi, I'm running proxmox cluster with 5 nodes and pure SSD Ceph storage (currently about 20 OSDs, all enterprise grade INTEL S3710/S4500, bluestore). Nodes are connected through 10Gbit network. Storage is about 50% full. Everything (system, proxmox, ceph) is updated to latest versions. On top of...

Same here :-( 4.15.18-1-pve I cannot update CentOS 7 because of the filesystem package. Running transaction Updating : filesystem-3.2-25.el7.x86_64...

Hmm, interesting. It seems that there is no difference fio --name=seqwrite --rw=write --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --bs=32k --numjobs=4 --size=2G --runtime=600 --group_reporting Gives me about 50-60 MB/s on both VM's fio --name=seqread --rw=read --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8k...

When I tried to increase the block size to 128k, I'm getting on the 10GB VM speeds like: READ: bw=592MiB/s (621MB/s), 592MiB/s-592MiB/s (621MB/s-621MB/s), io=16.9GiB (18.2GB), run=29251-29251msec WRITE: bw=253MiB/s (265MB/s), 253MiB/s-253MiB/s (265MB/s-265MB/s), io=7393MiB (7752MB)...

fio --filename=/dev/sda --direct=1 --rw=randrw --refill_buffers --norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8k --rwmixread=70 --iodepth=16 --numjobs=16 --runtime=60 --group_reporting --name=8k7030test But I started to investigate this issue after I found out that regular work with disk...