Search results

Yes, because i have a VM that has no public ip so i had to configure it in a way that it can receive updates anyway

Yes, this is what i did this days. I added a new bridge with 10.0.1.1/24 iface vmbr1 inet manual address 10.0.1.1/24 bridge_ports none bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 post-up /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o vmbr0 -j MASQUERADE pre-down...

vmbr1(ens19 on vms) is the bridge dedicated to inter-cluster communication. On the host there is also vmbr0 (ens18 on the vms) that is used for bridging node A and B with own IP and is working properly

Update: i did the following On host auto vmbr1 iface vmbr1 inet static address 10.0.1.1/23 bridge_ports none bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 post-up /sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o vmbr0 -j MASQUERADE pre-down /sbin/iptables -t nat -D...

Hi, i'm currently in the same situation here, i want a local network for 3 VMs (2 are already in bridge with host and 1 is natted with host). i tried creating a new bridged interface with no parameters inside as you can see And i assigned them to the VMs but they are not communication each...

C node is an ansible machine and what i want to do is to just connect it on the internet for updates and with A and B for executing commands on them, and i want to do that via internal network By the way, A and B are both bridged with the main node but they cant see eachothers, is this wanted...

Hi and thanks for the reply, This seems a good solution but are you sure i can enable a bridged interface without assigning a public IP address to it?

Hi, i'v a setup like that: -host --node A -> bridged, own IP --node B -> bridged, own IP --node C -> NAT with host (won't expose the IP) what i want to do is create a LAN where A B and C can communicate The fact is that i cant add the vlan tag to A and B because they are in bridged, but C has...