Search results

Indeed, not yet sent. Will report when I do it :)

Actually I think I'll send a patch but I have no clue if it'll be accepted.

In the bugzilla issue they didn't fix anything, just closed it and provided a workaround, which in my view is not optimal. Not sure where the change should go, but there should be a /etc/default/lxcfs with a LXCFS_OPTS= var to able to specify whether you want this enabled or not. I understand...

Can't you just use a vswitch then? https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/network/vswitch/

Yeah, I'm doing something similar right now, I might share my setup too!

What are those blue.de compute nodes for 1eur a month?

Any news?

Thanks @fabian, I've read the corosync github issue, looked quited involved :) Good job!

Is there a solution for this? If you're using ZFS and with aufs gone, your only choice seems to use fuse-overlayfs but then you can't backup the LXC or use ZFS replication, can you even migrate LXCs?

Same here: Version: root@pve02:~# pveversion pve-manager/6.3-6/2184247e (running kernel: 5.4.106-1-pve)

Hi all, We eventually found what was causing the leak and it was not in proxmox. It was a bug in a library (nss-softokn) in the Centos7 CTs, which is fixed by upgrading that library to a newer version, see the relevant commit: Bug 1603801 [patch] Avoid dcache pollution from sdb_measureAccess()...

The journal size is pretty small tbh: root@pmxc-12:~# journalctl --disk-usage Archived and active journals take up 24.0M in the file system. By the way, the OOM killer is never triggered because the CT gets almost up to its mem limit. 97% or so.

Thanks @oguz, if you need any more information let me know. I'll keep investigating on my side but at this point I'm out of ideas.

More information, issues on another CT for which the host we upgraded. Detailed pveversion: proxmox-ve: 6.3-1 (running kernel: 5.4.106-1-pve) pve-manager: 6.3-6 (running version: 6.3-6/2184247e) pve-kernel-5.4: 6.3-8 pve-kernel-helper: 6.3-8 pve-kernel-5.0: 6.0-11 pve-kernel-5.4.106-1-pve...

We are still puzzled by this issue and we haven't found the issue yet. More information: There have been no recent changes to that server that would explain that kind of memory usage increase. Other things we have observed: - Running kernel 5.4.106-1-pve and reverting packages lxc-pve and...

Eventually I removed the disk from the pool and then, with the remark from @avw, I could attach it as mirror: pool: rpool state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0B in 07:22:19 with 0 errors on Sun Apr 11 07:46:20 2021 remove: Removal of vdev 1 copied 415G in 1h0m, completed on Mon Apr 19...

Yes, I'm using GRUB to boot. I've upgraded proxmox but I'm afraid to do the 'zpool remove' now. I'll try to backup everything first, then I'll try.

zabbix-proxy and salt-master. The image used for both is centos-7. The zabbix-proxy one: arch: amd64 cores: 2 hostname: zabbix-proxy.mysite memory: 12288 nameserver: 172.1.11.254 net0: name=eth0,bridge=vmbr0,gw=172.1.11.254,hwaddr=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx,ip=172.1.11.100/24,tag=11,type=veth onboot: 1...

Hi, We have detected a strange (or not well-understood) behavior in the memory usage of, at least, two containers but we believe it's a generalized issue. After a CT restart the memory usage keeps steadily growing until, after a couple days, it reaches around 96-99% of the total assigned...

Any ideas?