Search results

Seen that too: https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/829

Possibly related but I had a similar experience on 6.8.8 after upgrading to v8 Previously I just had the bridges set to autostart on boot but it seems this may have changed and I needed to set the actual network devices to autostart as well. After that I rebooted and it came up OK.

OK - that seems to have cured it. many thanks!! So my understanding of IP Sets is less than clear - the documentation isn't as clear as it seems :-( I can now see for a VM we can: Create an IP Set "Test" Add rule Set Source or Destination > IP Set "Test" Direction, Action etc etc. But I...

OK - hunting through for clues. I realised that these were affected if the firewall was enabled for the VM as follows: 101 Fail - Firewall enable: 1 ipfilter: 1 102 Fail - Firewall enable: 1 ipfilter: 1 103 OK - Firewall enable: 0 ipfilter: 1 120 OK - Firewall enable: 0 ipfilter: 1 160 OK -...

I have wondered if I have done something stupid here - won't surprise me - but can't see anything glaringly obvious. Any pointers appreciated.

iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.8.9 on Thu Jul 18 19:07:45 2024 *raw :PREROUTING ACCEPT [330917937:301970615511] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [3912156:2099052544] COMMIT # Completed on Thu Jul 18 19:07:45 2024 # Generated by iptables-save v1.8.9 on Thu Jul 18 19:07:45 2024 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT...

OK, long post with info. Ping tests to godaddy.co.uk 101 Fail 102 Fail 103 OK 120 OK 160 OK 200 Fail On VMs with two network devices they are linux servers running their own DNS in a server/gateway mode with the net1 device set as a dummy 'internal' interface. They could be connected to the...

Thanks - I will finally get a chance to try this tonight!

I can do another iptables-save with the rules enabled if required.

Hi and thanks for replying. From any VM out to anywhere on the interwebs. It works perfectly with the firewall disabled at the 'Cluster/Datacenter' level eg this is with the firewall disabled. If I enable it this stops. [root@vm-main ~]# ping 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of...

I have a Proxmox server at online.net It runs a few VMs with linux servers. I thought I would try and run some firewalling - specifically to block/allow some IPs to all VMs rather than have to do it individually. Datacenter has 3 security groups remotemanagement - allows access for ping, ssh...

A second option I just thought of - I licence one server, and not the other (and no, I am not going to cheat the repos or whatever hacks people do) It doesn't help if you only have one server with multiple CPUs and wanted to help a little. It's all slightly nonsensical...... hey ho.

You have totally misconstrued the conversation. I really think you should go back and read *very carefully* what I - as original poster - have said. Note I'm also a board member of a not for profit building an open source small linux server where I do most of my open source stuff, and we rely...

Though mine were second hand they were pretty new when I bought them, and not exactly cheap either!! They weren't out of a data centre! But I do concur on the some of the reasons behind reducing CPU count in general.

In my (particular) circumstance a measure of CPU grunt - say BogoMIPS or somesuch - rather than pure CPUs would have helped. Both my unlicensed servers are less powerful, and do less, than my licensed one, but would require paying twice as much..... That's the situation I was trying to think...

It effectively already is! If you have a subscription it goes. I think it was introduced around 3.1 - remember the debate about it around then. e.g. https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/details-about-the-new-pve-no-subscripton-repository.15742/ Nope, I have not disabled it on my boxes. I am not...

Yes, please note I am in no way trying to criticise a great product. Prox is fab. But I do think they may be missing a sales trick here. The sales staircase can have a huge leap to the first step which can be a barrier for entry to a lot of small users - be that home users or SMEs. That...

Not sure where else to post this so thought I'd post it here for whoever it may concern. Having had one licensed Prox server for some while - thank you - I decided I had finally enough regular $$ to pay for a license on two other units I run. I really wanted to make a "donation to the cause"...

So I had issues with my shiny new 1Gb fibre from Movistar. Router happily connects to the interwebs but I needed to bridge it back to my Endian box. That required a PPPoE connection. If I ran iperf3 round the network everything appeared as expected at around 1Gb, but anything going in or out...

It was indeed!!!! I was getting number blind... Well, it sets the route, but it still won't bloody work. Grrrrrr! I must be missing a trick somewhere. Ahhh - sussed it. Route was still not quite right This did it: route add -net 10.90.114.192/26 gw 10.90.44.1 dev eno2 (other IP is on...