The forum is not under the GPL. Besides... it is a great resource for getting Help & Support - so in a way proxmox is already creating their own competition in providing such a resource.
They don't check whether or not you have a (valid) subscription when asking questions in the forum.
It is...
Agree to disagree.
IMHO you should not have published this on proxmox' forum - that's all I am saying.
You could have done that on your own website - google would have made sure everyone who wants it finds it.
I fully understand why proxmox censored this. This forum is *not* the right place...
It's Proxmox' decision what they want to have on the forum - and what they don't want. If you post this on your own website it wouldn't be so much of an issue.
If I may so: Proxmox has the rights to decide who's allowed to pee on their carpet.
posting a howto how you can remove the "nag" is...
The question that arises here is: what do you want your subscription fee being used for:
a) Development and providing good service
or
b) legal battles
I have had to testify as an expert witness in such cases. Not funny, expensive and time consuming.
I wish some open source projects would...
on that point I have to disagree - because I have seen otherwise numerous times.
There are people out there who willingly try to scam their customers - minimum effort for maximum return - while remaining absolutely clueless.
I won't go too much into detail but I have uncovered "rebranded" open...
Hi,
You could also create your own debian repo from this - but I would not recommend doing so if you are using the software for anything else but playing around.
Proxmox is doing a great job - and the systems have been rock solid over the last 10 years. Hardly any hickups.
I'm happy to pay...
I don't care what his intentions were - I just see the point of closing down a discussion about how tu circumvent what I see as a legal way of announcing that you're not having a valid license.
On a different level, removing the warning could also be used to fool your customer into believing...
That just shows how well maintained the forum is that you can find a 10 year old thread - and still reply to it.
kind of proof that proxmox as such is providing stable software and know what they are doing :)
Au backe - Wenn Du ganz sicher gehen willst... kannst Du (sofern vorhanden) die bestehenden VM Images auch auf einen NFS Store auslagern - und dann einfach in /etc/pve/qemu-server/ die .conf files wegkopieren - und dann nach dem re-setup wieder hochkopieren.
Dann noch das /etc/pve/storage.cfg...
Hi,
Ah, now I get it.
Maybe you could trigger the os status from the qemu-agent? At least once it's up and the agent is running you then could remove the ISO that way?
Tobias
Hi,
Ich gehe aktuell davon aus, dass er neue HW anschafft - wenn ein PVE Server ärger macht ist das meiner Erfahrung nach meistens hardwarebedingt.
Das mit den Encryption-Keys ist ein extrem wichtiger Punkt (ich habe genau aus dem Grund meistens keine Verschlüsselung am Start - aber den PBS in...
Hi,
As I understand it you're triggering the sigkill instead of using the API...
Have a look here: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/api-viewer/
With the API you can achieve what you're trying to do - IMHO a nicer way to script automatic deployment
Tobias
Hi,
I am not a huge fan of the x710 cards... we have run into various issues with those cards.
If you can get a 5xx chip card or upgrade to a 10/25g card (SFP28 are backwards compatible to SFP+ - so they will run 10G Connections)
Price-Wise they're about the same as the 5xx cards.
CU
Tobias
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.