Search results

This happened a second time, and now there's an entry for OOM killer... will allow for host to use more RAM and see what happens...

Looked in syslog in the Web UI - nothing other than storage checks. Looked in `/var/log/kern.log` as well - nothing logged during that period. It also seemed to have an issue as soon as I restarted the VM. After the Windows logo posted, it was killed by the OOM Killer according to the logs...

Thanks!! info much appreciated, I suspect the reason my cp cmd worked on the first host was because I copied the conf files to an intermediary folder... that was misleading.

well it worked on one host beautifully... but on another I have this very strange issue that I cannot work around old hostname in red (ends with a 2) new hostname in green (ends with a 1) I cant even create a new file there named 100.conf with nano... I'm stumped... I tried with some other...

Thanks! I'll give this a shot...

I'm currently pretty concerned as I attempted to change the hostname on a host after finding this wiki page: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Renaming_a_PVE_node thing is... I missed one very important statement on this page. I have since changed it back and am back to a functioning node. I am...

Ok, thanks for the update, I'm gonna do some stress testing and see if I can reproduce it...

@coolspot did you ever get this sorted out? I just now spotted almost the exact same error: Jul 07 16:27:17 hostname kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged Jul 07 16:27:17 hostname kernel: [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required. Jul 07 16:27:17 hostname...

this is a good point I missed. I'm still puzzled by this though... turned off all firewalls... I think I'm going to try to swithc to dhcp or another address and see what happens... edit: dhcp/new IP resulted in no change. The local network has no limiting appliances in place, new computers...

Just installed 7.2 on some new servers that came in. On the local network the Web UI, SSH, and pinging work as expected. interfaces file from a host with the issue: auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface enp5s0f0 inet manual auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 192.168.74.25/24...

If I have a VM that has two disks on different datastores (one very large) and they are both included in the backups, will restoring it on another Proxmox server with the same storage configuration be possible? can a restore support placing the large vm disk on the secondary larger datastore...

Trying to use the webUI to remove a zpool, and I got the exit code 1 error. I have 4 disks that are part of the zpool data": capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- data...

Thanks for the suggestions, I'm starting to look into those options now... I think I just found the thread I was talking about: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-backup-proxmox-configuration-files.67789/ Thanks again

I thought I recalled seeing some discussion on implementing proxmox within a product but I can't seem to find that thread. I'm trying to understand the best process for installation and configuration of a system that uses proxmox on a few servers. I think it would be pretty easy to take the...

Nice! this will work thanks!

I'm getting to the point where it would really help me to organize the VMs and containers I have into groups graphically but I've only been to get them next to each other by naming them with prefixes... Has anyone run into this issue and found a good solution?

yea that thread had the answer. I edited the numbers in the bridge-port definitions (in /etc/network/interfaces) to match those listed in the ip addr output. I can now ping as expected.

Three servers, three NICs each - one onboard Motherboard, two in 10Gbe PCIe card. They can each ping one another from the management NIC (onboard the motherboard). All of these NICs were previously fully functional for testing. All three servers were migrated to a new rack chassis - It is...

thanks for the tip! I actually have one virtio and one e1000 on that vm and I dont recall which one the test was over.... I'm going to rerun it. edit: yea that made a significant difference, seeing speeds I expected now

thanks for confirming, gonna hafta figure out why I'm only seeing a lil less that 1G speeds between vms... I'll look into packet size...