Search results

Don't get me wrong - the dangerous part is writing man pages without mentioning any kind of deletion as default setting. Besides, my point is not the backup as I'm just testing things, the point is writing clear manuals and making *SAVE* default settings.

delete this

I had configured a new backup task and was checking its status. The logfile states INFO: adding '/dev/virt_store_sas/vm-102-disk-1' to archive ('vm-disk-virtio0.raw') INFO: Total bytes written: 42945620480 (11.95 MiB/s) INFO: archive file size: 22.41GB INFO: delete old backup...

@dietmar: > Please file a bug: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com That's what I was looking for! ;) Done. @e100: I'm not very familiar with snapshots. Are they "application consistent"? If the VM is right in the middle of a database operation the snapshot could be inconsistent, could it not?

| installed: proxmox-ve_2.0-784729f4-19.iso | local SAS-Raid (3ware 9690SA) as LVM source | did 'apt-get-updet && apt-get (dist-)upgrade' right bevor trying to backup The following happens when I try to backup a (Windows 2003) VM from the local LVM-Storage (local SAS-RAID) to NFS: INFO...