Search results

I find the inclusion of OCI containers a lazy first attempt. More to the point, it offers very little beyond running docker in a container (which is fairly simple to do) but unlike that approach you dont have any granular control. Also, the need to predownload the OCI image is itself a departure...

what of it? the developers of PVE have their priorities. you have yours. if you really have a business case, develop it and contribute to the code. Its my opinion, sure. it just so happens to be shared with other operators, which is why you dont see any effort to do what you ask. No one is...

Interesting take. the PVE devs have made their position known on the subject, which you decided they "have neither the resources or the knowledge." Lets suppose thats true; why are you speaking as if that is some personal insult to you? Funny indeed. Why are you not using openVZ, but insisting...

Firstly- no one wonders this. And apart from that blanket statement I had no idea such a dislike existed. More to the point, it takes two to tango. the original comment wasnt pointed at you and required no reply. the PVE interface isnt/was never meant to replace a environmental monitoring...

Yes it did. The problem you are experiencing is due to how you tell the system to mount. sda and sdb are NOT static in a linux system. you need to change your fstab entry from /dev/sdb1 /data ext4 defaults 0 1 to UUID=[the uuid for sdb1] /data ext4 defaults 0 1 you can get the uuid using...

that shows sdb1 mount defined and mounted during boot. have a look at the dmesg output when your drive is NOT mounted.

please post from your guest: /etc/fstab dmesg | grep sd

Mounting of a zfs member partition isnt relevant in and of itself. does your zpool show a missing vdev when that happens? if yes, you got hardware problems- either host port, cable or drive. if no, you can safely ignore the missing mount.

wrong forum to ask. I'd start with your storage or application vendor.

OPs storage is a not a simple block target. the comment was likely encompassing the entirety of the storage solution. If all you want is a block target it will work fine for that purpose, and is in the supported application matrix, but considering the cost of said solution that would be akin to...

remove the heatsinks and reinstall with fresh thermal transfer compound. would be a good opportunity to clean and dust while you're there.

devil's in the details. What is "good" in this context? numbers under load would be a good start. kinda hard to hit a target that isnt visible/understood. This is most likely the way.

check if you can actually ssh between the nodes.

exception for nvme backed. those controllers are pretty much worthless.

Performance beyond your requirements is pointless. Establish your minimum acceptable performance, then benchmark with ZFS since ZFS gives you the full spectrum of features (snapshots, inline compression, file aware checksum, etc.) IF you are able to reach your requirements you're done- if not...

Laughs. easy question ;) SO... as I am fairly certain you already understand, this can't have an answer because the variables will be different with application/use case. If you want to make a file system that is a do-all you're going to try to outceph ceph, and thats likely a losing...

it does. the problems you are referencing had to do with issues specific to kernel version 6.8. simply install using an old (8.1) installer that used kernel version 6.5. or better yet pve9 and not bother with pve8 at all since it will be eol'd next year anyway.

yes. bear in mind if the container type is not supported on the older environment it wont boot. No. its a full reinstall. the question you should be asking is "SHOULD I run pve7 in 2025?" the answer is no, whether you use all the features or not. its not being patched. and pve8's days are...

same as you did it before. the only difference I'd be looking at is making it portable by deploying it as a docker container.

Understand that PVE is not designed or meant to operate as a desktop OS. I see two rational options depending of the answer to a simple question- are you intending to use this computer as a workstation or will you be attaching to it over the network from another machine? IF the SOLE computer...