Search results

  1. aasami

    [SOLVED] IPVS load ballancer can not establish TCP connection across two cluster nodes

    When noone replied, I have posted a ticket to the customer portal and here is the solution: Enable invalid packets with nf_conntrack_allow_invalid on all cluster nodes in /etc/pve/nodes/$NODE_NAME/host.fw: [OPTIONS] nf_conntrack_allow_invalid: 1 Thank you Proxmox for your superb support!
  2. aasami

    [SOLVED] IPVS load ballancer can not establish TCP connection across two cluster nodes

    Hi, I have an IPVS direct routing Load Ballancer VM (LB) which works only when the target Backend VM (e.g. B1) is on the same cluster node. If LB is on different node than Backend (B1), TCP connection between Client (CL) and Backend (B1) can not be established. CL sends SYN packet to LB and LB...
  3. aasami

    Migration Problem

    I've experienced the same ugly issue today. The "workaround" of using offline migration first and booting on the other node works and VM can be migrated online since then. But it's really sad. It afects all VMs on 1 of my 7 nodes. All nodes are fully upgraded.
  4. aasami

    [SOLVED] How to initizlize remote iSCSI LUN device with multipath?

    I have exported an iSCSI LUN with multipath to a PBS server in the SAN. How should I initialize this remote disk? It doesn't show up in drive list. # lsscsi [1:0:0:0] cd/dvd QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM 2.5+ /dev/sr0 [2:0:0:0] disk QEMU QEMU HARDDISK 2.5+ /dev/sda [3:0:0:0]...
  5. aasami

    PXVE, Nginx & Websocket proxy

    This doesn't seem to be the case. I've set proxy_pass to single host. The 8006 works okay but SPICE proxy on 3128 doesn not: server { listen <server_IP>:3128; include mime.types; server_name <FQDN>; location / { proxy_pass https://n1:3128; proxy_set_header Host $host...
  6. aasami

    PXVE, Nginx & Websocket proxy

    How about SPICE proxy is it working for you? I have tried to proxy it over nginx but without success: upstream spice {ip_hash; server n1:3128; server n2:3128; server n3:3128; } server { listen <server_IP>:3128; include mime.types; server_name <FQDN>; location / { proxy_pass...
  7. aasami

    Disk Usage and Maintenance

    Oh. My apology. It looks like old spam is purged indeed. I just wasn't expecting that we are getting THAT MUCH spam weekly. o_O # journalctl -u pmgspamreport.service -- Logs begin at Thu 2020-07-23 09:00:06 CEST, end at Thu 2020-07-23 10:39:03 CEST. -- -- No entries -- # journalctl -u...
  8. aasami

    Disk Usage and Maintenance

    Single node It seems I have misunderstood how it works. A haven't touched any timers or services. Here is my setup: # pmgversion -v proxmox-mailgateway: 6.2-1 (API: 6.2-5/05a7829e, running kernel: 5.4.44-1-pve) pmg-api: 6.2-5 pmg-gui: 2.2-2 pve-kernel-5.4: 6.2-4 pve-kernel-helper: 6.2-4...
  9. aasami

    Disk Usage and Maintenance

    This thread is not marked as SOLVED so please let me jump into it. I'm experiencing the same issue as OP with steadily increasing disk utilization of disk sapce in /var/spool/pmg/spam, but not due to failing pmgspamreport.service. I have "Send daily admin reports" turned off which disables the...
  10. aasami

    [SOLVED] What's the point of a Separated cluster network?

    Sure it did! The solution to my question was just to shutdown the "offline" node (either physically or via ILO) and it automatically moves all VMs to other nodes according to ha-manager policy. When the (simulated) network issue has been resolved, and the node has been powered back up, VMs...
  11. aasami

    [SOLVED] What's the point of a Separated cluster network?

    How to migrate VM from such (offline) physical server node to another when only available connection is the separated cluster network? Is it possible?
  12. aasami

    [SOLVED] What's the point of a Separated cluster network?

    Hello. I've set up a cluster with physically separated cluster network but it is not doing what I expect it to do. Here is my lab: [node1 ~]# pvecm status Cluster information ------------------- Name: clustest Config Version: 3 Transport: knet Secure auth: on Quorum...
  13. aasami

    [SOLVED] multipath on iSCSI

    I run it on every physical host in a cluster so I can migrate VMs quickly from node to node.
  14. aasami

    [SOLVED] multipath on iSCSI

    Thank you @UdoB ! That is exactly what I was hoping to hear. I have removed iSCSI storage in GUI and created new LVM storage on top of existing volume group (VG). # pvdisplay /dev/mapper/hp3par --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/mapper/hp3par VG Name vg01 PV...
  15. aasami

    [SOLVED] multipath on iSCSI

    Hello all! I would like to ask for help with configuration of multipath on iSCSI disk in Proxmox 6.2. I have configured multipath on the server: [hp12 ~]# iscsiadm -m session tcp: [1] 10.1.100.112:3260,22 iqn.2000-05.com.3pardata:20220002ac005aab (non-flash) tcp: [4] 10.1.100.113:3260,121...
  16. aasami

    LVM on iscsi

    I had the same problem as @niller except I've tried to use the whole device without partitions. [sv20@08:27 ~]# ls /sys/block/*/holders /sys/block/dm-0/holders: /sys/block/dm-1/holders: /sys/block/dm-2/holders: /sys/block/loop0/holders: /sys/block/loop1/holders: /sys/block/loop2/holders...
  17. aasami

    [SOLVED] Base Volume not displayed when adding LVM on ISCSI

    I have tried the same with latest updates and it surely isn't fixed in pve-storage 6.1-6. Using pve-storage 6.1-8 the issue is still there. Even the workaround mentioned in bugzilla doesn't work. Checking or unchecking the box "Use LUNs directly" has no effect and it won't show up in Base volume...
  18. aasami

    iSCSI Shared Storage Resize whilst system still live

    Sorry to revive an old thread, but I've come here looking for the same answer. Here is is how you can do an online resize with multipath. 1. Extend LUN on your SAN. Then, do on every host in a cluster and extend multipath device (this steps are NOT propagated to all nodes in a cluster): 2. Pick...
  19. aasami

    [SOLVED] Why do KNET chose ring with higher priority instead of lower one (as said in manual?)

    That change of one word from "lowest" to "highest" doesn't explain anything. The highest priority will allways be 1. Everything else is lower priority. So, when something is named as priority everyone is assuming decelerating importance. May be because I'm not a native english speaker, I would...