Search results

Hi, Ok, I have to post the same images one more time :): this is my network setup in Proxmox: LAN and VLANs in pfSense: The Proxmox's VMs are connected via vmbr1 to VLAN1 (192.168.10.0/24) If I plug any device to the enp5s1 NIC it goes on LAN (192.168.5.0/24) and gets its own ip...

Hi, I installed pfSense as a VM in Proxmox, then I plugged a dd-wrt device to the second physical NIC . I use the first one to access Proxmox and pfsense via WAN as well. for more details about my configuration you please have a look at my previous thread here...

UPDATE I FIXED IT FINALLY. It was the Windows' Firewall.

This is strange. I restarted all my devices this morning, I tried it again, and it turned out that I can now open a Remote Desktop session from my external PC to my Windows VM in Proxmox in VLAN10, but I still can't ping it!

Ok I think I got it right ...for the most part at least. In order to make it as simple as possible, I decided to create two VLANs only I set up VLANs in pfSense first: then I tagged a VM's network device (My Windows VM in Proxmox in this case): For VLAN10, I set 192.168.10.0/24 as its...

ok According to my goal, as for pfSense only, do I need to delete LAN interface and add only VLAN interfaces? Please see image four. Thanks

I dont' think I have understood option 2..anyway I'll most likely go for option 1, but I need to make sure that I got it right. So, when I enable "VLAN aware" on the virtual bridge (vmbr1) it would be as if I had set up a trunk port for my VLANS? Correct? Are you talking about the PHYSICAL...

Hi, For the time being, I've installed pfSense in Proxmox as a VM. Here is the diagram: On NIC1 is my WAN connected to my ISP router in, say, DMZ Here is my Proxmox network setup: In pfSense the two virtual switch are seen this way: Basically the LAN above with IP 192.168.5.1 manages...

I'm not sure what you mean with current state. Did I save the "NOW" configuration? In that case it would be ok since I saved the "after unbound" configuration before removing it. Thanks again

I did a backup of the "after_unbound" snapshot and put the file elsewhere, so I think I saved the last configuration this way. I think that I'll remove the more recent snapshot as you says. Anyway It would have been much easier getting back "on the fly" to a previous snapshot. I didn't know...

it is probably my fault because it is likely that I haven't yet understood how the rollback in Proxmox works. I tried to rollback to a previous snapshot of a LXT (before_unbound): But after I ran it I got this error message: So, how can I possibly get back to a previous configuration I...

Same VM (pfsense) running at the startup before and after I upgraded to V7

Ok, but I didn't make any changes to my configuration and VMs, nor added new VMS. I haven't understood why there wasn't any TAP device in the list before I upgraded to Proxmox 7. Thanks

Hi, I upgraded to Proxmox 7 and averything seems to be ok. Anyway, I ran the ip -c link command and I now see to new network items in the list: .... tap102i0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 tap102i1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 They both have their...

Could it be a problem with the VM backup itself?

Hi, I had a problem with my zfspool, and had to replace a disk. I took that chance to turn my 3-disks zfspool from RAIDZ into "mirror" with only two disks (it's a just little home lab I use to practise). it seems that everything went well, and I started restoring my VMs from my backups. The...

So, I should destroy and recreate my VMs and it added disks if I want to change the volblocksize? Thanks

It is set on 8K. But I read on the excel sheet that it wouldn't make any difference with a zfs pool made of 3 disks . By the way, what is the difference between the "RAIDZ1 PARITY COST, PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL STORAGE" sheet and "RAIDZ1 PARITY COST" sheet? I think I got it now, thanks Last thing...

Yes, I created my pool wirh ashift of 12. I need now to learn how to set volblocksize Yes, I could add virtual disks in the hardware setup and save my Vm and its Virtual disks together. However I'm trying to figure out if there is really a difference between the two methods I mentioned above...

Thank you for the file. My pool is raidz1 with 3 500GB-size disks. So, I need to know the best volblocksize before creating a virtual drive, because otherwise I'd risk to waste space. Correct? Could you help me figure out the best disk size setup to get the most out of my 250GB dataset...