Search results

Ok, you have a lot of points there :). Second try, now using a NUC. My aim is to install proxmox on the samsung 980 pro, which is an PCle 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD. Then, for storage purposes, I will add another NVMe M.2 SSD drive, possible a 2 TB. And indeed my aim is to pass-through that drive to the...

I came up with this final configuration. Any thoughts? Would this be a nice, power-efficient homeserver for proxmox? Totaal € 556,27 # Category Product Prijs Subtotaal 1 Processor Intel Core i3-9100 Tray € 117,42 € 117,42 1 Barebones ASRock DeskMini 310 € 162,64 € 162,64 1...

Hey @Dunuin , thanks for your good feedback! I have a follow-up question. The past few days I indeed passed-though to a VM by getting the /disk-by-id value and configuring the VM to attach that disk. This works fine. But I want to do it the same way as you describe, so passing-through the REAL...

But then, what is needed to do actual PCI passthrough?

Hey, thanks! I haven't considered this option. You mean this, right? (And this) I was thinking too complex I guess. I thought that I had to create a virtual hard disk for the VM and use THAT as the storage location. Then I foresee all kinds of troubles like huge backups, etc. I will try to...

I was wondering: what is the best approach for me to run a samba share on my proxmox host. Please note: I'm talking about a home-server, please don't worry about HA and stuff like that. I only want my local machines (in the local network) to be able to connect to a hard drive that is physically...

Hey, I need a bit of advice here for my home server. Currently I'm running Proxmox on a 2014 PC with a Intel Pentium G3240 on a Asrock B85M PRO4 mainboard. This does the job fine, but I want something new. Also, the hardware is almost 10 years old now, so it's time for something new. I found the...

Clear answer. Indeed for portability reasons I understand this. Thanks again .

Thanks! I wonder why proxmox doesn't set the default value for this option based on the host CPU.

I have a question about the performance of my Ubuntu 22.04 VMs, running on my home server. In Proxmox 8, the default CPU is "×86-64-v2-AES'. When I keep using this setting, then the performance is really bad. However when I change the setting to "Default (kvm64)", then everything works really...

Oh my god... my bad :). I filled in the ip address in the DNS "domain" section.

Thanks for your (quick!!!) reply, @Moayad ! Here is the output: rogierl@services [~]$ ip r default via 192.168.1.1 dev ens18 proto static 172.17.0.0/16 dev docker0 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.0.1 linkdown 172.18.0.0/16 dev br-c982adcafdc5 proto kernel scope link src 172.18.0.1...

I have the following situation: Proxmox 7.3.3 on the host, one network card available in the host. The host has ip address 192.168.1.100 I'm trying to run an LXC container (Ubuntu 22.04) I applied the following networking settings for the LXC container: Name: eth0 Bridge: vmbr0 IP address...

Hey all, I'm a happy proxmox user for my home server; working great! Now that past few months I used tailscale as my mesh/vpn solution, but that's overkill to me. Therefore I'm now checking out a SSH jump server. Now I'm wondering what the best approach is here. I can think of many options...

Dude! Thanks man!! Proxmox rocks! So happy with my subscription here... everybody should do that if running Proxmox on their home server.

See the logs here. I notice this: Dec 02 08:40:07 pve systemd[1]: pvedaemon.service: Consumed 3min 31.155s CPU time. Dec 02 08:41:18 pve pvescheduler[901]: server stopped Now this isn't VERY long, I have to admit :). But it feels like this took longer than before. So basically the question is...

Well, for me it started to happen after upgrading to v7.x. Currently I'm running version 7.1-6. Is there a way to check what is causing the slow shutdown/restarts?

Found out that the installer by-default ticks this "" setting. I don't need (and want) that for my home-server VMs. Un-ticking gives me the full available disk space (as configured in Proxmox)

Here more info: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1269493/ubuntu-server-20-04-1-lts-not-all-disk-space-was-allocated-during-installation

What would be the reason for the installer to tell LVM to not use the full capacity?