Search results

  1. M

    pveperf: very bad fsyncs/second :(

    i checked the alignment: Disk /dev/sdb: 32.0 GB, 32017047552 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3892 cylinders, total 62533296 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier...
  2. M

    pveperf: very bad fsyncs/second :(

    The Host SSD is a Sandisk SDSSDRC-032G-G26 ReadyCache: http://www.amazon.de/Sandisk-SDSSDRC-032G-G26-ReadyCache-interne-schwarz/dp/B008U3038I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1386405481&sr=8-1&keywords=sandisk+ssd+32
  3. M

    pveperf: very bad fsyncs/second :(

    Hi, i checked the BIOS... nothing special there. The SSDs are Sandisk Sata3 32GB for Host and Samsung Pro 128 GB Sata3 for the VMs. The pveperf results for the N54L: CPU BOGOMIPS: 8785.34 REGEX/SECOND: 918604 HD SIZE: 13.53 GB (/dev/mapper/pve-root) BUFFERED READS...
  4. M

    pveperf: very bad fsyncs/second :(

    Thanks for your hint! My filesystem is ext3 on the host and ext4 for the VMs. And in the other machine, there is a ssd (with host and vm on the same ssd), too. the VMs are attached with this mount: /dev/sda1 /vm_system ext4 defaults 0 0 I think it is not relevant for the pveperf test? My...
  5. M

    pveperf: very bad fsyncs/second :(

    Hi there again. I did the pveperf test: CPU BOGOMIPS: 10376.46 REGEX/SECOND: 1193260 HD SIZE: 7.14 GB (/dev/mapper/pve-root) BUFFERED READS: 64.46 MB/sec AVERAGE SEEK TIME: 0.29 ms FSYNCS/SECOND: 102.64 DNS EXT: 90.72 ms DNS INT: 1.19 ms...
  6. M

    Installation on a USB SSD?

    ok... i will take a real ssd. I put the host and the vms on it... or is this crap, too?
  7. M

    Installation on a USB SSD?

    Hi there, will there any problems installing proxmox on a USB2.0 SSD-Stick (like: http://www.ebay.de/itm/Kingspec-16GB-SSD-MLC-NAND-Flash-SSD-Solid-State-Drive-USB-Stick-16-GB-pocket-/290970687213?pt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Computer_Festplatten&hash=item43bf3456ed or that...
  8. M

    Short question: 2 different networks working?

    Hi there, the following configuration: There are two different DSL-networks (DSL1 and DSL2) available. I wanna put a additional NIC in my server, then i would bridge these NIC to a VM (this should go via DSL2 to the internet). The other VMs are connected via DSL1 to the internet...
  9. M

    What do i have to use to get hdd pass through working (sata, scsi, ide or virtio)

    I thought it was with scsi because of the ide-limitations (only 4 devices). I don't really know what is the matter now... i will test it with other options (if there are) the next days.
  10. M

    What do i have to use to get hdd pass through working (sata, scsi, ide or virtio)

    Well, i have a Celeron G1610 CPU in my proxmox and it doesn't support VT-D. BUT: As you can see on the picture (openmediavault as a vm) it worked some months ago. The "only difference" between now and the past is the motherboard: Past: P8H77-V LE Now: ASRock B75 Pro3-M But maybe it was not...
  11. M

    What do i have to use to get hdd pass through working (sata, scsi, ide or virtio)

    Next Step/Try: I now use Proxmox itself via hdparm (hdparm -S 120 /dev/disk/by-id/ata-xxxxxxxx for 10 minutes spind down time) to spin down my VM attached HDDs. It works very well and i get my power consumption from around 60 Watt to nearly 35 Watt (6 HDDs connected). Great!
  12. M

    What do i have to use to get hdd pass through working (sata, scsi, ide or virtio)

    Hmmm, now i tried sata and scsi via qm set 100 -scsix/satax but there where no correct pass through to the vm. What i mean is, that the HDDs were recognized as "Qemu Harddisk". It works too but i am absolutely sure that i had a "real" pass through (with SMART Data and correct SerialNo of the...
  13. M

    What do i have to use to get hdd pass through working (sata, scsi, ide or virtio)

    Hi there, i have a openmediavault installation as a vm in proxmox. The HDDs are added like that in the vm.conf: virtio1: /dev/sdc,backup=no virtio2: /dev/sdd,backup=no virtio3: /dev/sdf,backup=no virtio4: /dev/sde,backup=no virtio5: /dev/sdh,backup=no virtio6: /dev/sdi,backup=no The data...
  14. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    the interesting point is, that i have changed nothing - anyway... everything is fine and i hope it works now (and not only temporary) THANK YOU anyway!!!
  15. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    Ok... sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=10240k,nr_inodes=502936,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 tmpfs /run tmpfs...
  16. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    really crazy things here... now i had 150 MB/s with my VM machine... i now understand nothing :/
  17. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    Thanks for your help so far! here are my results: 1.) hdparm -tT /dev/sda : /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 7564 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3785.07 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 180 MB in 3.02 seconds = 59.61 MB/sec dd doesnt work? "invalid output flag: `fdatasync'" 2.) I tried nearly...
  18. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    Here is my fstab of the Host: /dev/pve/root / ext3 errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/pve/data /var/lib/vz ext3 defaults 0 1 UUID=xxxxxxx /boot ext3 defaults 0 1 /dev/pve/swap none swap sw 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/sdb1 /vm_system ext4 defaults 0 0 /dev/sdi1 /vm_backup ext4 defaults 0 0...
  19. M

    Low results with pveperf (the reason for bad HDD performance?)

    Here are my results of pveperf: CPU BOGOMIPS: 19152.36 REGEX/SECOND: 962716 HD SIZE: 7.14 GB (/dev/mapper/pve-root) BUFFERED READS: 15.87 MB/sec AVERAGE SEEK TIME: 0.57 ms FSYNCS/SECOND: 95.95 DNS EXT: 113.60 ms DNS INT: 1.18 ms I have some...