Search results

Indeed, it seems to be a permission issue.

I would say that your test platform will not correspond at 100% to the real-life providers platforms. I expect you to see big differences, like factor 2. Be careful to cache levels that your test platform can enable (and that you shouldn't have in real-life providers platforms). Some...

You can script it. I don't know any manner to do it with the GUI.

I had problems importing from VMWare when disks where not in thick provisioning or with snapshots. If you want, you can try this tool for windows VMs : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/disk2vhd I already moved servers like that. But be carefull to the eventual lost of...

Maybe saving the last boot option is a solution for you ? GRUB_DEFAULT="saved" GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT="true"

On your VM configuration you can limit vCPU number, RAM size, disks IOs and bandwidth and network bandwidth. So almost all resources allowed to a VM can be controlled. What can't be simulated and controlled is an infrastructure saturation by others VMs (this case can be encountered when you use...

Did you enable Proxmox Virtual Environment firewall ?

Proxmox Virtual Environment will be responsible of the VMs shutdown sequence. Now the host can indeed be asked to shutdown by nut client on it. Your UPS has a network card. The driver should be : snmp-ups look at and test : https://networkupstools.org/docs/man/snmp-ups.html BR

Hello, I don't think that putting a compilation chain and compiling a kernel module for a backup solution is a good idea (neither on the security neither on the stability concerns). Personally I would not do that. Now if you really really want to do so, try : apt install linux-headers-amd64

Do it by command line ? pveum user list pveum user delete

Ok, no problem here. Can you dump here the file /etc/pve/storage.conf ?

Wohooo... 4.18 kernel is from 2018 and you want it to work optimally with recent kernel VIRTIO drivers support. I don't think it is a good expectation. Do not use virtio drivers, take full devices visualization drivers and try again with both OS, we will see ?

:oops: Rocky 8 and Debian 12 on the same host, with same parameters,same underlining hardware, same virtio drivers and so on ?

Maybe you have slow acces to this NFS share ? You can send the results of : time /usr/sbin/rpcinfo -T tcp 10.88.90.38 nfs 4 time /sbin/showmount --exports 10.88.90.38 time ls /mnt/pve/mnt/pve/tintri1638 nfs4

Did you reboot it ?

Hello. My point of view : - Using remote CEPH is a bad idea form me as this will lead to catastrophic performance. - Using remote 5 nodes cluster for quorum votes is good only if : - your internet link is always up (if not, you won't be able to operate the local nodes) - latency between all...

Yes ! I forgot this ! Thank you to have spotted that. So @sherrellbc shall wait for the Ubuntu 25.04 that will use Linux kernel 6.14 by default it seems (source : https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2024/11/linux-kernel-6-12-has-landed-and-its-a-big-one)

Like @UdoB said, it is OK. I do almost what you did for a NextCloud VM. @louie1961 what is not optimal for you could be optimal for someone else. For example for simplicity, robustness, integration. Personally I like to have Proxmox Virtual Environment dumb and complete backup, knowing that all...

Personally I test thing after thing. For example iperf3 -F test network bandwidth + file access + potentially VM OS cache , VM FS cache, host OS cache, RAID card cache, disk cache, ... For disks I use : https://wiki.liberasys.com/doku.php?id=diskwipetests:disks_wipe_and_tests&s[]=test For...

6.12 kernel will come with Debian Trixie (see : https://packages.debian.org/testing/kernel/). Proxmox may integrate it before Trixie release. We just have to wait. Or you can try kernel compilation ;)