Search results

Hello, it seems that snapshots are handled correctly now (1.0.6) ... They can be erased manually and automatically as well ... Thanks for the good job and happy NY2021

Yes, you're right, this what I did is not this "directory" ... I added new store by entering path to a nfs-moint-point/"directory": Sorry for mixing it up with PVE "directory" (Storage) term ...

in proxmox zfs-concept, in general, there is no shared (nas/san) storage. vm storage is always local and "redundancy" is being achieved through scheduled zfs-storage-replication ... one of the most important condition would be that zfs-storage on every node must have the same name ... If...

real-nfs-storage scenario means that datastore is somewhere on the network and not being "hardware-part-of-PBS". "By-design" PBS datastore should be local hard-array which means much faster than NAS (nfs-share). But PVE is not aware of PBS datastore types and it only sees PBS as PVE-Storage. PBS...

upgraded to 1.0.3 but still same issues

Of course no, you're right ! :)but this is very lab-ish scenario just to test nfs share as storage etc. But in real-nfs-storage-scenario data flow always goes first into PBS and then out of PBS towards nfs-share ... there is no direct connection between VM and nfs-share (except PVE-backup...

Hi Stephan, I mounted nfs share from/within virtualized PBS itself (to /mnt/nfs... ) and then attached this mount as "directory" store to PBS ... if this is what you meant

and it always creates new dirty-bitmaps: INFO: virtio0: dirty-bitmap status: created new INFO: virtio1: dirty-bitmap status: created new

fstab -> 10.10.75.10:/data/nfs-pbs /mnt/nfs-pbs nfs rw,async,soft,intr,noexec 0 0 still the same error message ...

root@pbs03:~# ls -alhR /mnt/nfs-pbs/store1/vm/301/ /mnt/nfs-pbs/store1/vm/301/: total 4,0K drwxrwxr-x+ 1 backup backup 610 stu 14 19:48 . drwxrwxr-x+ 1 backup backup 12 stu 14 22:58 .. drwxrwxr-x+ 1 backup backup 0 stu 15 09:15 2020-10-26T11:15:04Z drwxrwxr-x+ 1 backup backup 0 stu 14 22:53...

status update : In pve host I lowered max-backup down to 5 and I suppose this picture shows attempt of keeping only last 5 five snapshots and deleting older ones ... But this lasts for too many days already ... This would be garbage collection responsibility or ? BR Tonci

Hi I've just done that in may lab. I mounted (fstab) nfs share to a local dir : 1.2.3.4:/data/nfs-pbs /mnt/nfs-pbs nfs rw,async,soft,intr,noexec 0 0 and then added it as datastore with this (absolute) path : /mnt/nfs-pbs .. did not understand what you meant by your question at the end ...

Hello to the team, 1st of all congrats for PBS which makes PVE more pwerfull than it was (also powerfull) before. I've made test-setup (1pve host, PBS as VM, pbs store -> local dir in PBS as nfs mount (netgear RN102) ) I took me a while to figure out how it works/handles "remote" store such...

Yes, thank you both for your responses ... I hope I resolved it ... the problem was that I cleared only the content of lxc subvols (i.e. /rpool/data/subvol-xyz ) but not the content of the whole /rpool/ . As soon as I deleted the content of the /rpool/ , subvols were mounted correctly...

Hello to all, yes, I'm experiencing the same issue ... after upgrade to vers 6 , lxc datasets are not mounted ... directory is not empty etc... After cleaning subvol directories , I can mount them manually and fire container up. But reboot resets the situation back to the same ... no subvols...

Figured it out !!! :) Subvols had not the same ID as lxc itself . As soon as corrected , subvols have become "replicatable" !

Hello to all, I'm using latest 6.0.x proxmox and want to replicate lxc container but also got "No replicatable volumes found" error . Also , GUI shows zero size for those volumes: this lxc has been transferred with pve-zsync from the host that is not cluster member .... Any ideas ? Thank you...

Centos cannot be installed too , the same experience like ubuntu ... Debian template works ok.

I finally solved this ... as soon as I reconfigured language settings it started working :) Thanks !!!

You use LVM for image store or just extX linux partition ? A couple weeks ago I transfered few terra's of VM *.qcow2 images with scp and occupied 1G link between two 5.1 hosts ... was suprised how fast it was