Search results

Hello there, as mentioned here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/getting-permissions-issues-when-running-a-backup-job.149015/#post-674361 your errors seem to come from permission issues on the SMB share. All the output you provided points to this as well. It also mentiones that the backup...

Okay, so my guess would be someones logged into the system bulk shutting down vms. If you want to provide more information it would be useful in solving this matter if that truly isn't the case.

Nope, geht leider nicht. pve-manager und Kernel haben die neuesten Updates. Immernoch das gleiche Verhalten.

1. Yes 2. ZFS would still be my choice, but with the limited RAM you have, you would definitely need to MAX your ARC size, because it could take up to 50% of your RAM. Otherwise MD-RAID is one way to go. 3. Both is possible. I'm a fan of having my block devices only in the Proxmox host itself...

I do not think that this is a security issue as long as access on the proxmox nodes is restricted. Anyway, i don't know which provider you have, but the switch at the WAN side should only send packages through onr port anyway. Anyone else: If i'm missing something here, feel free to correct me.

May i just ask what licencing issues you're reffering to? Just an idea: disableing the kvm module in boot cmd in grub config?

I'm sorry, but probably no one here understands whatever you wanted to know. Maybe try a more detailed rephrasing?

Ich hab das selbe Problem. Mit beiden meiner Microserver Gen10 Kisten.Sowohl mit Proxmox Backup Server als auch mit Proxmox VE. Ich gehe daher mal von einem Kernel Problem aus und habe dazu einen englischen Thread eröffnet...

Hello everyone, i'm kind of lost here. I'm having the same issue as described here in the german thread: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/reboot-problem-hp-microserver-gen-10.100508/ Just as a side information: I've had PBS running for a while on an HPe Microserver now. Last Week Friday i...

Can't u just setup a VM on your proxmox host with proxmox backup server and use the cifs share as a datastore? That'd solve the issue. I'm doing that with a synology HA setup at a clients place too. works fine.

Actually @Rassillon is onto something. But instead of paying for veeam i'd install a proxmox backup server and do incremential backups.

I don't think it should cause any issues. But i would offline the disk first. Just don't do something to the healthy drive. And i hope we're talking about Raid1 here.

Yes, that is correct. It limits I/O bandwidth. Do you use a seperated Network (VLAN?) for backups, or have the possibility to do so? If so you could create a VLAN or another network, add the VLAN interface, or network interface to proxmox and limit the bandwidth with tc or wondershaper for...

Thanks @H4R0 for pointing out, i didn't catch that. Seems like they're Seagate SAS Exos drives with 2.4TB. I'm taking a guess here by saying, that those drives are usually pretty reliable, but even if a double disk failure is likely to occur which would destroy the pool. A triple disk-failure...

Your Pool ist resilvering which in RAID is often called rebuilding. After it's done it'll remove the old device. You can see the progress on top.

Then just execute zpool replace rpool sdd /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-35000c500d34f804f

Can you give me the output of "zpool status"?

Whoops sorry, i meant ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/ | grep sdd My mistake.

Just do: ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid/ | grep sdd and you will see the UUID of the disk. then run zpool replace OLDDISK /dev/disk/by-uuid/NEWDISKUUID POOLNAME like i said.

Maybe it is not /dev/sdd. Like i said, please check dmesg.