Search results

Debian 13 isn't even released yet. Magic 8-ball says try again later.

Just to elaborate a bit, I've been pretty pleased with the Linux support on the FW 13 laptop. I've got the AMD one and they officially support a number of distros on it, which I took as a good sign. Debian Bookworm isn't one of them but I've been running it for a year with good success. I used...

I'll let you know when I get mine. I don't think any been delivered to customers yet. They are saying Q3, which just started a few days ago.

That's what Stop is for.

If the guest is Linux you probably can just change it. If it is Windows you may need to repair afterward. Why do you think you need to change them?

Is hard because of compression. It is difficult to know up-front how big the final archive will be. Making assumptions will lead to wrong answers and user grief (in both directions). Is unsafe because if the new backup fails you are down by one. Best practice is for the administrator to make...

A stop + start will do that.

Probably. I guess that depends on whether you are comfortable allowing anyone, anywhere, to try to hack your server. Putting your server's management interface on the public internet with no firewall is very far from best practices in regard to security. Why do you want this? That is the...

Unless this is a business connection his provider almost certainly does not want him to set a static IP. In the case he has done that (rather than DHCP), the provider is going to block him.

Or you could look at the logs and try to reason it out. That's work, I know, but it might actually help you find a solution.

Did ChatGPT advise you to look at the syslog (journalctl -b0) or the task log (in the GUI) around the time of the stoppage?

Two IP's on the same subnet is usually a recipe for trouble. It does odd things you might not expect. What kind of software is this? Some kind of proxy? If so, it is likely expecting two different subnets so that packets can be sent between them. ETA: Depending on why you are doing this there...

So it seems to be specific to a particular Ethernet driver used by RPi4 boards. Which explains why I have never seen this problem, as my OpenWRT is running on a Celeron J1900 with Intel Ethernet. Nice find! ETA: On the other hand, the #1 cause of "temporary failure in name resolution" is a bad...

Why is managing Ubuntu remotely "troublesome" to you? Perhaps someone can help you fix that. Do you have an SSH server installed? Managing remotely by command line is much simpler than using RDP or whatever remote desktop things.

Just FYI, I have a bunch of Debian machines, both VM's and hardware, behind an OpenWRT 24.01 router, all using the router's DNS. It works fine. Whatever's wrong isn't an inherent thing in Debian or OpenWRT. I don't currently have wireguard enabled though, so that's one difference. Did you...

I think if you upgraded from an earlier version that did use syslog you might end up with leftover log files in /var/log as well.

If your use-case is to use VM's locally on your machine you might be better off with a desktop product like VirtualBox.

PVE does not install wifi support tools by default because wifi is not really suitable for this purpose. With most access points you cannot bridge multiple VM's to one wifi interface. It is not "hard", it is not possible. So you need to set up IP routing with NAT. See here for some options. If...

User space will likely be based on Debian 13 but they use Ubuntu kernels because Debian doesn't integrate ZFS.

If you are going to do a thing that isn't recommended by the people who made the software, you don't get to yell about the lack of documentation of how to do that thing. You also need to look into the actual purpose of the "nesting" feature, which isn't for what you think it is for.