Search results

Directory /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu hardlink libsgutils2-1.45.so.2.0.0 to libsgutils2.so.2 pbs boots after that and seems to work, can some dev confirm this as solution workaround for now?

first, i have to agree you absolutly need raid 10 on database VMs also instead of virtio i woudl recommend using SCSI/SSD Emulation and discard. that allows to trim (hey we want anything extra we can get) -as a quick note dirty hack to switch to SCSI (and not bluescreen because of drivers) is...

they let you schedule a system state backup and you absolutly need one. DO NOT RESTORE A DC JUST VIA VZDUMP. Here is the thing. If you have only one DC, then it might just work to restore it - MIGHT (still possible to "loose" machines within the network that requires a rejoin but the rest...

yea well i know but this is not what i ment as in promoting. this is what american comapnys have spot on. the list contains 2 that dont even promote promox on their website or the PBS, 2 that do but only one offers pricing the other wants a request. real promoting with a possible cashback flow...

well technically the error is correct which is the best type of correct. let me answer with a question: where is your VM storage ?

yea you guys should promote these kind of services, like a site for partner offers and similar to spread the ecosystem or offer something yourself. right now the narrative is either own second server or a module to the usual suspects like gdrive. optimal would be to be independet of dropbox...

is nobody offering this as a service ? would be better to focus giving service provider that option (or like integration into their sales software) and stay with the ecosystem. we need better alternatives than google, microsoft and amazon. honestly a feature like that would kill any aspiration...

when it walks like a loop and quaks like a loop its probably a cat in a loop :)

forget the time rules. if you roughly know the subnet pbs2 getting new adresses you can simply lock it down to that network. but evne if not, just exposing a vpn port is just fine. its a minimal attack surface and any more is not worth the hassle. it would be more of a headache to debug issues...

several things here. #1 raidz-1 isnt optimal at all. its like a raid5 and with such big disks not that fault tollerant as you might think. theres a chance loosing a junk. also 4disks are suboptimal for either. problem is not total capacity but high capacity over 1.5tb a drive. in any case you...

in case of micron msecli -N -f 1 -m 0 -g 4096 -n /dev/nvme1 msecli requires registration on their website to get the download link

forgive me resurrecting this threat but iam basically in the same boat. almost identical dell / epyc, running 2tb microns 8x in one pool. now the wierd thing is with compression off my cpu load goes over 50% on benchmarks within the VM. while it stays down at around 30-35% with compression on...

is there now a feature request i want to vote for it a backupserver that has to be onsite is kinda only half the game. its not useless but you absolutly need an offsite option in case you know burning buildings, thefts, nuclear strikes whatever

im running it currently on 20ish servers, almost all of them had at least once this issue running it on ubuntu doesnt say anything about running it on debian/proxmox with a different kernel and testing goes only so far, since we dont really know the root cause we dont have a way to reproduce for...

sorry with all the corona things going on i didnt check and put new project on the side. yea thanks, iam aware of 2 buffers, but this is always the case also with your hardware raid boot drives. thanks for your input, i was wondering if theres a hidden string im gonna fall over so its really...

@narrateourale btw, im aware i posted a "noobie" question, that doesnt mean iam one. but at times no matter how much experience you have, you might not shure about some basics and im not to proud to ask as there could be always a thing i dont know lurking in the dark. so no i do not need...

you should consider that a- your anecdotual experience has no statistical significance b- zfs isnt used for root as much asside proxmox, instead its used on datadrives with no os on it c- zfs for linux is a recreated not the same as it is for solaris d- its pretty much irrelevant how much...

no not an hardware raid im aware of that issue yea that was my plan. plain debian, mdraid for root partition as a raid10, then identical layout on all disks for zfs then proxmox. its jsut a plain storage box anyway, performance isnt even an issue, just datasecurity and size. guess it will...

i do use a lot of zfs on many many systems, in production. however id prefer to have it only on data drives and have a seperated systemdrive. i even use on some zfs for root but there i have kvm access to the servers and can quickly resolve any boot issues. new serever in question doesnt have...

Background, About to rent new server, unfortunate limited setup so i cannot have a dedicaded boot drive. So normaly i would go for GTP layout and zfs root install. However problems with ZFS on root i resent months on some servers makes me think Is there any argument to be made against...