Search results

Hi All I 've got an issue with Ubuntu 8.04, 9.04 and 9.10 guests where they lock up after live migration but only if I have more than 1 CPU enabled (in the guest config) (I'm upgraded to the latest of everything including the test archive) I'm using both virtio and virtnet, but I have tried...

Cool, you did not mention that in your initial reply to my comment :) Mike

It may not be, I've given it a try and it seems to work ok, but that's not really the point. Your looking for a solution in the medium to long term. For the same reason you support KVM not XEN, we need to look at the preferred option which is LXC. :) hope I've not being to forceful Thanks...

This is a really good idea, keep the option for OpenVZ by simple having separate machines which support different system but are managed by the same GUI. Mike

Ok, after even more reading I decided to try something. I installed proxmox on one of the compu blades, then created a 200G raid 5 virtual drive which I added as a shared device proxmox-123:/var/lib/vz/template/iso# lsscsi [0:0:0:0] disk Intel Multi-Flex 0304 /dev/sda...

This is actually incorrect, the unit I have on my desk support full shared storage, plus drive cloning. I've had live live-migration working with xenserver, worked a treat. (just costs to much and I wanted KVM) The storage controller has a miniSAS connector which I have plugged an external 16...

Hi All My reading of the documentation would seem to indicate that ProxMox is not suited at this time to using on a system which uses direct attached shared storage. (eg Intel Modular Server) These systems have a miniSAS connection between the CPU board (blades or individual servers) and a...

Has any one looked at "Linux Containers" as a replacement for OpenVZ. its a part of the lastest kernels and seems to do most of the things OpenVZ can do. http://lxc.sourceforge.net/ Maybe the better option might be to build capability for this into Proxmoz and over the phase out openVZ. Would...