Search results

awesome, thanks a bunch!!

great, thank you pool: vmpool state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 1.20M in 00:00:00 with 0 errors on Fri Jul 30 09:51:54 2021 remove: Removal of vdev 2 copied 23.3M in 0h0m, completed on Sat Jul 31 09:59:12 2021 11.7K memory used for removed device mappings config: NAME...

I started out with; pool: vmpool state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM vmpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0...

Is reporting on ECC currently implemented in pve7? If not is it on the roadmap? and if so could we have an indication by what version/release date? I have found a few interesting atricles. I'll share one; https://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/Memory-Errors I am not sure but I also think I...

Perhaps automated snapshots can help if one have automated zfs send to a backup location

at the risk of going greatly off topic on a thread that has been solved already. I do want to react as you have been such a great help to me so returning the fafor is the least I can do. Windows server 2019 can run fine with 2 cores and 2 GB. The bare bones (including desktop and audio) install...

one should indeed never run windows 10, a realization I had many months ago. one coulld run windows server 2019+ whiich does not do crapware that I am aware of. But even the server is not free from calling home/telemetry so one could run https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10 or something...

you can try taming your windows commit memory hungry VMs by using https://github.com/lowleveldesign/process-governor I am running into memory issues on a another proxmox setup I have and will try that as soon as time will allow. Currently far too busy with stuff, this forum being one of them ;)

I can confirm the following; GPU passthough with the gear I have using the underlying virtualization stack of proxomx (I believe it is kvm/qemu) used to be non trivial. With the latest kernel 5.11 and what not gotten by using proxmox 7 things got a whole lot easier. Also contrary to the...

@bobmc , can you please elaborate? i.e. Did you mean SR-IOV? Multiple VM's running on the same host with the same card passed through but not turned on at the same time? Or more in general had multiple successes over several proxmox setups?

When running; pveperf [options] I never get results including BUFFERED READS: xxx MB/sec AVERAGE SEEK TIME: xxx ms I am running the latest pve 7 fully upgraded Anyone know what's going on and how to also include those stats?

Hello Ph0x, I never meant to step on your toes. In fact it was you that involved yourself with my threads. Please teach me where I went wrong in your opinion. I am here to learn and I value your input. Let's prevent getting carried away ok?

@ph0x I am super ecstatic. Let a man revel in his joy please? ;) And also since my original post is closed as Solved. Perhaps someone can throw in another bone or two

yeah sure these are not 'server' components. But let me tell you this. this seems to be kicking ass at the moment. Sure hard core enterprise ssd's will make this system look like a snail but pveperf /vmpool CPU BOGOMIPS: 742448.64 REGEX/SECOND: 3904958 HD SIZE: 1335.86 GB...

I am totally in love with the proxmox 7. GPU and Audio passthrough work straight out of the box!!!! Even multiple trx 2060+ to one VM is happy camping. Next on my to do is make sure my 10GB NICs are actually 10GB Nics Current system; * AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (CPU (64 core - 128 threads))...

thanks all for the in depth explanations, patience and what not. I am extactic at the moment. I am considering getting an additional 2 wd blacks for an extra striped mirror. if you guys think i could even get more speed with that

!! WOW !! pveperf /vmpool CPU BOGOMIPS: 742462.72 REGEX/SECOND: 4013371 HD SIZE: 1725.80 GB (vmpool) FSYNCS/SECOND: 3501.27 3501.27 sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

currently I got this; pveperf CPU BOGOMIPS: 742462.72 REGEX/SECOND: 4060522 HD SIZE: 899.00 GB (rpool/ROOT/pve-1) FSYNCS/SECOND: 532.78 OS running on 2 samsung 980 pro ssd's in the slow m.2 sockets on the mobo. Not sure why I am getting double the speed now as before...

results for a 6 way mirror are in; zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0...

any of these comparable? i have selected for durability...