Search results

Indeed, thank you. However installing rasdaemon does not lead to being informed of events there in a similar manner like SMART events do. My humble request is to have those be included out of the proxmox box so go speak

it could be a soft nudge towards the backup services. I think I do not know what I am talking about

That is a serious issue. I hope it gets picked up

Thank you for this in depth explanation. I believe someone already mentioned something similar in passing earlier in this thread or another. Was not the issue with this approach that it will not work when the laptop is connected to another network?, like in a hotel?

Although not happy with no one trying to chip in. I can report now that syslog is now again being populated after reinstalling rsyslog How was proxmox able to show syslog messages via the gui even though the file on disk was abandoned?

I am running proxmox 7.3.3. and I get SMART emails if something is going on with a HDD that needs attention out of the box. that's great. But I also would like to be alterted of ECC memory and other RAS events. Please consider a line in the syslog (when viewed from the web gui)...

wow, I am soo dislectlic. thank you for spotting that. that was indeed the problem. I messed up an rsync operation once and never knew why. now I know I made a typo. thanks again

yes, it was well clear in the script to apply the -e argument. but it did not help much. only around 500Mb or so was cleaned and the digging process also gives me no leads ;( du -h --max-depth=1 / 108G /LTdata 1.2T /LTData2 512 /media 144M /var 46M /dev 0 /sys 2.0K /mnt...

Did you ever dind the answer? I am running into the same issue. I have a 128GB ssd zfs 2 way mirror. almost totally full. Running the cleanup script did not help ;( Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on rpool/ROOT/pve-1 113G 109G 3.7G 97% /

ok Leesteken, I was under the impression that both Martin and Tom were Proxmox team members. From the same team that never addressed this specific questions of mine. For the rest of us yes, all volunteer and such.

Now once again, I am not here to start a fight. In fact I am leaning towards this great community.

here is one example https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/if-i-get-a-subscription-would-this-be-covered.107174/#post-460720

I use backplanes from supermicro and silverstone. all configured to be dumb. The syslog does show that the OS notices the loss of a drive.

and before we start asking. 'what is your use case'please address my earlier questions related to the level of supprt regarding certain issues first then. So my raising a concern about ZFS is NOT amongst those.

I really do not mean disrespect @martin I respect and love proxmox and your team. But I have asked onthis forum some times if something would be covered by getting a subscription. The answer was always radio silence. So I am not sure what...

I am ringing the alarm bells.!!! ZFS should not be idle. I mean it is a small price to pay when every 30 seconds the tiniest of IO operation if done. Maybe every 1 hour or what ever seems useful. Doing no health checks is beyond my understanding at the moment. Can someone please shed some...

yes Fiona, A file create operation did trigger the pool to notice one of it's drives was missing. Is this intended behavior from the source code? If so then I would like to follow up with the OpenZFS people that build the code to learn about the reasoning behind this decision. It might be...

also, if I would run a FreeBSD system and do the same. Would it behave similar by being silent some of the times? The point I am trying to make is that I no longer believe it is the ZFS code. It might be there have been done some slight adaptations by the Proxmox team that allows for this weird...

anyone? How do I create an intensive IO operation so I can pull a disk from the pool involved in said operation? I do stress out though that this should not be needed in the first place. I'd be so much helped to learn why the current mechanism is how it is.

In an effort to shine more light on the matter I am trying to create a disk pull out scenario while the pool is in operation .. zpool status pool: notimportant state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 1.18T in 02:42:31 with 0 errors on Thu Nov 24 15:48:51 2022 config: NAME...