Search results

HOST net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1 net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 0 net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms = 1 net.core.bpf_jit_limit = 528482304 net.core.busy_poll = 0 net.core.busy_read = 0 net.core.default_qdisc = pfifo_fast net.core.dev_weight = 64 net.core.dev_weight_rx_bias = 1 net.core.dev_weight_tx_bias =...

Here You are: pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 8.4.0 (running kernel: 6.8.12-9-pve) pve-manager: 8.4.1 (running version: 8.4.1/2a5fa54a8503f96d) proxmox-kernel-helper: 8.1.1 pve-kernel-5.15: 7.4-15 proxmox-kernel-6.8: 6.8.12-9 proxmox-kernel-6.8.12-9-pve-signed: 6.8.12-9...

Guys, gurus, would You comment my question?

Here You are a result of comand in lxc guest: sysctl -a | grep -E "net.core.rmem_default|net.core.rmem_max|net.core.wmem_default|net.core.wmem_max" sysctl: reading key "kernel.apparmor_display_secid_mode" sysctl: reading key "kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_io_uring" sysctl: reading key...

Appreciate for advice. Here You are, guys. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Zram

Would You share with certain example for LXC?

Look, guys. In my case swapiness =0 and system has 128G of RAM and storage is on zfs (2xNVME mirrored) Swap is off and host is ok BUT in one CT (lxc) db software requires formally a presence of swap over 500M. How i can fullfill that requerement as "cheaper" as possible? Or I should follow # To...

Hi, guys! I'd appreciate You for helping to figure out my case. I have two completely identical hardware with clear by default installation of Proxmox VE partitions and Backup server. Here You are: Proxmox VE Proxmox Backup server As You can note it's a difference in file system... And...

It's annoying, that we got a warning about bind mount point also. What's is wrong with it? Why PM think i'll delete bind mount point while restoring LXC from backup?

It sounds mystique, but the only provement about incident remains system email: ZFS has detected that a device was removed. impact: Fault tolerance of the pool may be compromised. eid: 6 class: statechange state: REMOVED host: bs time: 2024-02-17 07:51:44+0500 vpath...

Guys, it's ok now and PM works as all good people helped me. i need one more advice. Look, degraded SSD is about 1 week from shop. It's not good case... To return it to the shop I must prove that it was a problem of that SSD... Is it possible to find out somewhere in syslogs the provement...

It seems to be a proxmox-boot-tool format /dev/nvme0n1p2 proxmox-boot-tool init /dev/nvme0n1p2

Would You clarify, what /dev exactly? s -la /dev/nvme* crw------- 1 root root 241, 0 Feb 17 15:44 /dev/nvme0 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 259, 0 Feb 18 10:34 /dev/nvme0n1 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 259, 1 Feb 18 10:34 /dev/nvme0n1p1 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 259, 2 Feb 18 10:34 /dev/nvme0n1p2 brw-rw---- 1...

ls -la /dev/disk/by-uuid/* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Feb 18 10:12 /dev/disk/by-uuid/06c2dfd4-5749-4e84-b8c6-9a7317428503 -> ../../sda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 18 10:31 /dev/disk/by-uuid/0FF5-B5BA -> ../../nvme1n1p2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 18 11:15...

Guys, and one more stuck 8) roxmox-boot-tool status Re-executing '/usr/sbin/proxmox-boot-tool' in new private mount namespace.. System currently booted with uefi 0FF5-B5BA is configured with: uefi (versions: 6.5.11-7-pve, 6.5.11-8-pve) How i can add new SSD here? Documentaion is unclear (for...

Appreciate for Your view! Got resilvering!

Look, I detached new disk from zpool, deleted partitions and cloned it by sgdisk /dev/nvme1n1 -R /dev/nvme0n1 sgdisk -G /dev/nvme0n1 But now I'm in stack with attaching... zpool attach -f rpool...

As I can understand zpool remove|add will destroy pool. But zpool detach|attache is for working with mirror's disks exactly. Whould You clarify that moment? root@bs:~# zpool status -v pool: rpool state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 104G in 00:02:26 with 0 errors on Sat Feb 17 09:54:12 2024...

Hi, guys! Just encountered that one of two SSDs from zfs-pool on mirror RAID1 was degraded. After - replacing SSD - running zpool replace -f rpool 7349143022040719209 /dev/disk/by-id/nvme-Q2000MN_512G_MN2312512G00269 - got a success ZFS has finished a resilver But as You can see got a...

Well... Talking about wipefs -fa /dev/sdX I mentioned any boot system that has wipefs onboard. In my case it was a Rescue Boot System of my hoster...