Search results

  1. K

    Rules not being applied?

    on the return path i get this the who object is @mydomain.com Return-Path: <synchronization@mydomain.com> Received: from mail.mydomain.com (LHLO mail.mydomain.com) (192.168.3.170) by mail.mydomain.com with LMTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:17:00 -0500 (COT) Received: from mail.mydomain.com (unknown...
  2. K

    Rules not being applied?

    thanks for the reply, the rule was to block any @mydomain.com because internally email do not pass though PMG the fakeemail is @mydomain.com
  3. K

    Rules not being applied?

    Hi I was wondering if someone could shed some light on the issue im having, Currently i created rules so that external emails cannot send fake email to my domain ex: synchronization@mydomain.com to cartera@mydomain.com synchronization@mydomain.com being the fake email i created a rule to...
  4. K

    issue with vmbr0: port 1(eno1) entered disabled state

    Well whats odd is that it did not affect none of the vms for me
  5. K

    [SOLVED] Redirect emails?

    your right, i had the rule for outbound didnt realize it thank you again
  6. K

    [SOLVED] Redirect emails?

    Thanks for the reply, so i solved on zimbra using the BCC going inside of I tried the BCC on Proxmox but only works for outbound nano /opt/zimbra/common/conf/sender_bcc and adding @domain.com and redirect to the email i want
  7. K

    [SOLVED] Redirect emails?

    correct, but its to forward mails and not domain
  8. K

    [SOLVED] Redirect emails?

    Thanks for the reply, but on the action objects i dont have the action forward running 6.1.2
  9. K

    [SOLVED] Redirect emails?

    Hi I was wondering if someone else has accomplish this, Currently im trying to redirect emails from @clientdomain.com to a certain user@mydomain.com the idea is that But i could not find any option or action to send or forward Thank you
  10. K

    Proxmox xshok script

    Hi I was wondering if someone else has tried the xshok proxmox script on their server for production? Currently using it on a test environment and i see that everything seems to be working fine. Havent seen nothing out of the ordinary wget...
  11. K

    Bench test with SLOG?

    Thanks for the reply, correct i was reading back then that its dangerous running it, but so far haven't had any troubles yet as i have copies. I use ZFS because of the way it uses snapshots while having the VM on with no issue. I thought adding a slog or l2arc would speed up more the ZFS pool...
  12. K

    Bench test with SLOG?

    thanks for the reply, so if i have zfs set sync=disabled rpool its pointless having a slog?
  13. K

    Bench test with SLOG?

    Hi I was wondering if someone could shed some light. Currently trying to test out the speed difference with slog and without, in my test environment i have computer with 32 gigs of ram and raid zfs1 with toshiba 1tb HDD 7200rpm I ran a bench test (not sure if its the correct way to benchmark)...
  14. K

    [SOLVED] pve-zync another port?

    Thank you so much, that did the trick, I had to add on hosts root@pve3:~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 192.168.6.48 pve3.casa.local pve3 192.168.6.49 a1 and with editing the .ssh/config host a1 HostName 192.168.6.49 Port 2201
  15. K

    [SOLVED] pve-zync another port?

    Thanks for the reply, so after trying various was still could not get it working, Not sure if i understood correctly, so i created a test environment to try it out before so server b1 is 192.168.6.48 and server a2 192.168.6.49 on server b1 i went to the config and added this root@pve3:~# cat...
  16. K

    [SOLVED] pve-zync another port?

    Hi I was wondering if it possible to to pve-zync to another port Example: I have two server in site A server a1 server a2 And on site B i have another 2 servers server b1 server b2 i would need to pve-zync from server b1 to a1 and b2 to a2 but without the use of site to site, Currently i would...
  17. K

    Nested Virtual Box

    Sorry for the late reply, this week im going to try another approach and post back
  18. K

    Nested Virtual Box

    whats odd is that kvm within the ubuntu works but virtual does not really odd
  19. K

    Nested Virtual Box

    Thanks for the reply so im using this guide https://notes.netbytesec.com/2020/12/cape-sandbox-installation-from-0-to-hero.html $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt install virtualbox virtualbox-ext-pack -y $ sudo virtualbox
  20. K

    Nested Virtual Box

    Thanks for the reply,whats odd is that i can run KVM within the ubuntu machine i think it might be a virtualbox 6.1 issue as 5.1 seems to work root@prometheus2:~# pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 6.3-1 (running kernel: 5.4.73-1-pve) pve-manager: 6.3-2 (running version: 6.3-2/22f57405) pve-kernel-5.4...