Search results

Small improvement: Delete the uuid and label-id,while copying, so new ones get created, so no doubles: sfdisk -d /dev/WORKING | sed 's/, uuid.*//; /label-id/d;' |sfdisk /dev/REPLACEMENT --- My whole recipe: Zpool replace disk ================== Get disk IDs ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/* If you...

I have the same Problem

You asked if ZFS was designed with Virtualisation in mind, yes it was designed for use with solaris zones. ZFS provides subvolumes (used on proxmox for lxc containers) and ZVols (used on Proxmox for KVM Virtual Machines), ZFS provides snapshots and zfs send/receive, used on proxmox for periodic...

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.cs.hmc.edu/~rhodes/cs134/readings/The%2520Zettabyte%2520File%2520System.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwij7IyF-N6IAxUchP0HHRneAJUQFnoECEQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1dvqCFM60OhKiM5266sthf

Without a forensic analysis of the ZFS pool we will never know for certain what happened in this case and the reason for it. It is a very unlikely problem, but very unlikely things happen. I am quite sure the data could be recovered, but it probably would the expensive and time consuming. I...

Irrelevant in this case, since the data loss is in the striped mirror (aka raid10)

Yes there are many reasons to use ZFS, especially with proxmox, and yes ZFS was designed with Virtualisation, SSDs etc in mind. I would higly recommend ZFS on a Single Node Proxmox Setup (in a cluster you might want to use Ceph). As always, have backups. ProxmoxBackupServer is your friend

Thanks for the info, please implement acl support in the tar.zstd

What do you mean by restore code, i downloaded the missing folder as tar.zstd and unpacked it on the container. What is the official way to do a file restore with ACLs, other then to do a full restore of the Container? Are the ACLs present if i fuse mount the Backup?

Virtual Environment 8.2.4 with ZFS, acltype is posix Privileged LXC Container FileRestore: Download tar.zsdt File and inside the container, unpack it, so no restore log otherwise full restore with new Container ID, ACLs are restored by full restore. The problem is some ACLs are restored with...

After Complete Restore: ################## head -n 40 .acl/entwickling_acl # file: Entwicklung/ # owner: 1000500 # group: 1000500 user::rwx user:1001620:rwx user:1001623:rwx group::rwx group:1000500:rwx group:1001620:rwx group:1001623:rwx <--missing in file restore mask::rwx...

Yes, only a pam / system user gets a shell access. If you get your PVE users from AD / LDAP you also need to setup winbind or sssd to get shell access

Bei 2 Servern ZFS verwenden zur storage Replikation

You can check with proxmox-boot-tool status if the bootloaders is installed on both disks, unfortunatly you can not really check if the system will boot without booting it ;)

No, you can replace the missing disk ;)

This should about work, you do not need the detach, after shutdown and physical disk replacement just copy the partition table : Copy Partition, remove uuid and label in the process (so that they are not duplicates) sfdisk -d /dev/WORKING | sed ’s/, uuid.*//; /label-id/d;’ |sfdisk...

That sounds very interresting, have you documented your setup somewhere?

No, in this case i have 3 Disks with zpool zp_extern1 to zp_extern3. The all have a zfs subvolume backup-extern with the mountpoint /backup-extern root@srv01:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zp_extern3 4.13T 13.9T 192K none...

If you run pve7 currently (even if it is out of service), you can still reinstall a new proxmox7 (even if not recommended)

1. You do not need a second PBS (even if it is nice to have;) ). PBS now supports a local sync. 2. You also do not need ZFS for PBS on your external storage disks, any Linux FS will do. This is how i did it: /usr/local/bin/backup-replicate-pbs.sh #!/bin/bash export...