Search results

Not saying it isn't possible, but I don't see the benefit personally. It's another layer of abstraction that isn't officially 'the way' of doing it, so possible support issue. docker on KVM, on the other hand, is supported, known, and easy.

I don't think putting a container in a container is adviseable. Spin up a basic *buntu or Debian of CentOS KVM host, and then put your docker stuff on that.

Mostly because this isn't windows.

Dang, no cloudinit in this one? I'm desperately awaiting that.

This is also a concern to me, and I'm getting it on a non-touchscreen win10 device with Chrome and Edge. Very frustrating. I found that in Chrome, when I attempt to do something like add storage, it would simply crash the browser. Edge would eventually load the screen, but rendering it very...

Odd question, but will this work with 2 disks setup in a 'spanned volume'? Idiot previous admin did this, and I need to get rid of the machine. 2k8r2, 3 disks, 1 C:, and 2 spanned to create D: hosted on VCenter 5.5 . Of course, those spanned disks are also where the users profiles are stored so..

Pre-Allocation of space like that is for the best performance. The space is pre-allocated, but isn't used. do a du -h on your qcow disk, and you'll see it's actual size. It's thin provisioning bud.

It's not a requirement, it's a recommendation written for enterprise in mind. 2*10Gb/s links is both for redundancy and bandwidth. You can get by just fine for small loads with a few bonded Gig cards, or even a single gig if you're feeling risky. With the cost of 10gb dropping drastically...

I'd absolutely love to find a way to make proxmox through a reverse proxy work via a subdirectory. Currently, I can get only get it to work on the root, which while it works, is far from desireable. i.e. somedomain.com/proxmox instead of just somedomain.com

I'm sorry, but software raid 0...do you enjoy the sadness of recovering your vm's or something?

As others have said, yes, you can do that. however, I would recommend at the very least paying for the community sub. It's cost is quite low, and helps support the development of this great product. I also work in Government, and understand how there is never any money. As such, we pay out of...

The nodes need to be able to talk to eachother for the clustering to work. I know in older versions it needed multicast, not sure if that's still true. I believe some people have had success setting up nodes to vpn to eachother, and using the vpn as the cluster network, but it was slow. You...

So, I'm adding some networking cards to my cluster, by adding another 4 port intel to each host. I'll be bonding these 4 together, and making them slaves to the main bridge, vmbr0. However, I also want to have a seperate management/backup/migration network, to make sure those tasks don't...

So, you can hit your AD that's on the 1gb? Then you're on the 1GB. Have you checked your network configs on the vm itself and not the host, as well as the firewall on the host?

The VIRTIO drivers present as a 10GB network. They 'negotiate' at that rate as well, as the VMBR0 allows them to. VMBR0 then passes that traffic on it's own uplink, in this case your 1GB. Think of your VMBR0 as a switch. All your vms on that switch can talk over it to eachother at a really...

In a perfect world, you'd use all SSD for your storage, in a RAID10 Array or such. However, that wont work if you have large files. Personally, I use SAS drives in a ZFS Mirrored VDEV setup hooked up over 10GB fiber on NFS. It works wonderfully.

Quite a bit, actually. ZFS is ZFS still, and works the same way. Just a few features are missing on the ZFSoLinux deployment compared to BSD.

Re: Advice - Open Monitoring Distribution (OMD) - check_mk_agent install on Proxmox H It works. I have this running in production. It monitors my hosts quite well. I still install the agent on the guests.

You'd think so, but my storage is pure SSD based, so IO has been historically pretty darn good. But I'll keep it in mind. Thanks!

Well, that's easy enough. Is there any issue having cluster comm and storage communication on the same bridge then? I could only see an issue in an HA scenario, where it's booting up a crap ton of VM's due to failover of a node, and that could saturate the nic bond. If that's the case, I...