Search results

hello. just for test puposes. I have pve latest proxmox-ve: 7.1-1 (running kernel: 5.13.19-6-pve) pve-manager: 7.1-12 (running version: 7.1-12/b3c09de3) pve-kernel-helper: 7.1-14 pve-kernel-5.13: 7.1-9 pve-kernel-5.4: 6.4-11 pve-kernel-5.13.19-6-pve: 5.13.19-15 pve-kernel-5.13.19-5-pve...

I had TFA enabled then wanted to add a cluster to add another node in my primary datacenter, so I started in the GUI added a cluster and then copied JOIN and went to 2nd node to add it and would not allow me because of TFA was enabled... so I went to TFA and disabled it via GUI then logged out...

just by any chance can you give me (an example( via a command line to test ? thanks so much for taking the time to answer :) Kind Regards, Spiro EDIT - i tried speedtest cli and get errors root@proxmox:~# speedtest cli Speedtest by Ookla [error] Error: [111] Connection refused...

Hello I just had a quick question I never asked. do we need this speed test cli installed on Proxmox, or is it just used for speed testing your system? does it have any affect on the speed of which it download packages and updates of Proxmox or Debian? I know I installed it cause the old ones...

then after change permission to 700 run systemctl status pveproxy

chmod 700 /var/log/pveproxy sorry i forgot to mention that last time please try chmod this directory to 700

for directory pveproxy should be drwx------ you have only read write - should be drwx

run this after systemctl status pveproxy

try this as well

chmod 640 /var/log/pveproxy/access.log

run this command again ls -ld /var/log/pveproxy I think the permissions are wrong here\\ mine looks like this root@proxmox:~# ls -ld /var/log/pveproxy drwx------ 2 www-data www-data 4096 Mar 31 03:44 /var/log/pveproxy root@proxmox:~# ls -l /var/log/pveproxy total 3224 -rw-r----- 1 www-data...

But I can use the directory for both backup storage and vm - lxc’s. I guess when I need more space for vm lxc’s I can add another hard drive and use that with lvm-thin. Zfs is this a better option when having 2 hard drives. Better than LVM - Thin Faster or not much of a difference ? And...

ok perfect sense so I will just use 1 partition and do that. :) so by doing this Directory my VM's and LXC's will use qcow2 and they will be using LVM-Thin < Is that correct. all my VM's icreate will use LVM-thin that seems perfect if that works that way and so much more easier and Logical...

Hello and thanks for your help @Dunuin my question here would be if backups are happening on a single partition vs creating 2 partitions would this slow down the vm's or CT's or its the same drive so there is no difference ? I was thinking to create 2 partitions and then resize to what I need...

right now I have local this is for backups images etc then I have local-lvm thinpool so my vm and ct goes here so anyway to create this below config. Storage> local2 use this for backups 700gb allocated space (but take backups from both [sda] and [sdb] storage > local-lvm2 ThinPool 300gb...

hello I am using latest PVE, proxmox-ve: 7.1-1 (running kernel: 5.13.19-6-pve) pve-manager: 7.1-11 (running version: 7.1-11/8d529482) pve-kernel-helper: 7.1-13 pve-kernel-5.13: 7.1-9 pve-kernel-5.4: 6.4-11 pve-kernel-5.13.19-6-pve: 5.13.19-14 pve-kernel-5.13.19-5-pve: 5.13.19-13...

thanks

@Fabian_E I went ahead and umount then removed line in fstab then did your above process. the only thing I noticed it created 2 backup_drive under starage in PVE NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda...

one last thing, I can think of - have you tried a different kernel maybe downgrade the kernel and see if that may be the issue?

Ah ok I'm sorry I thought I read VM . hopefully Proxmox Team can help you more Best Regards, Spiro