Search results

Hi @Stoiko Ivanov and thanks for your reply. We've already set URIBL but we reach the limit of calls. Is there any method to check if the sender is from the same domain of the account used for authentication? Thanks

Hi, we have the same problem using synology share, here is my /etc/fstab: //192.168.6.12/pbs01_be**** /mnt/pbs01_be**** cifs uid=34,noforceuid,gid=34,noforcegid,credentials=/root/.smbcredential,iocharset=utf8,vers=3.0,noperm,cache=none 0 0 //192.168.6.12/pbs01_abz...

Hi everyone, in these days a client is receiving some messages with a from address that seems from our Proxmox Mail Gateway but the sender is a different address. I have set SPF to fail but I still receive them. Return-Path: <dayset@dayset.com.tr> Received: from pmg01.abzsrl.it (UnknownHost...

Hi @Stoiko Ivanov and thanks for the reply. pmgqm could help us. I have seen that with the mail that the user receive has got a link for its own blacklist / whitelist panel, is there any option to generate that link for every user that I need? Thanks

Hi, is it possible to enable the spam report just for selected domains? Some users want to see it, but a large part of our clients is not interested / would be bothered by it. Thanks in advance.

ok. i tried creating a new disk and this new disk has deep flatten enabled. i'll move all files in this new image. Could this the root cause of this? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ceph-storage-all-pgs-snaptrim-every-night-slowing-down-vms.71573/

EDIT: Adding benchmark

Could be all caused by the fact that the new disk has a different format? Not GPT and LVM. in this thread https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ceph-luminous-to-nautilus-upgrade-issues.56268/ seems it has to destroy and recreate all "old" osd originally created in luminous.

yes, one for each vms. 14vms total. network is 10Gbe bonded in active/backup to 2 different switch. i did benchmark on first install before going production with crystal disk mark within a windows vms and all was good. yes and no, after adding the disk it start backfilling and all was...

rbd image 'vm-110-disk-3': size 3.9 TiB in 1022362 objects order 22 (4 MiB objects) snapshot_count: 14 id: 25d9c06b8b4567 block_name_prefix: rbd_data.25d9c06b8b4567 format: 2 features: layering, exclusive-lock, object-map, fast-diff...

This is the situation after quite 10 hours. Can anyone help us please? Thanks

Hi, we take snaphost of vms every night at midnight and remove the 16th snapshot. After removing snapshot all pgs go in snaptrim status and this goes for 9/10 hours and the vms are unusable until it finish. another things: we added 3 disks, one for each node last week and the new disks...

i've tried to enable the balancer feature: ceph mgr module enable balancer ceph balancer mode upmap ceph balancer on and the space available increased a bit, but the balance is not perfect. I have noticed that the total space is slowly increasing over time. Maybe the balance happen when data...

Hi, if i do a rbd du i have this warning, each for every snapshot and the image itself. warning: fast-diff map is invalid for vm-110-disk-3 i noticed that on a newer vms this not happen, so i think is something related to new versions of cecph. I started the cluster with version 5.2, 2 years...

Hi, we have a problem after adding 1 osd for every node (intel SSD 3,8TB), after adding each disk it takes 7-8 hours to rebalance, but after it start complain about disk full and the pool doesn't expand in size. There are 3 nodes, each with 2x300GB for OS and 4x3.8TB SSD for ceph. Doing maths...

Thanks mate, I thought that domain > subdomain ;)

Hi, I've inserted a domain DOMAIN.TLD into the blacklist (WHO OBJECTS), but the email are still delivered. I have seen that the email come from AAA.DOMAIN.TLD. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks

So it's something in the LOG. I hope I won't have this problem in the next weeks ;)

Every search with interval of time prior to 04-05-2020 11AM and post that time, working fine. Just with searches with an interval of time that starts before 04-05-2020 11AM and finish after 04-05-2020 11AM, I have that error.

Hi @mira, this morning all the searches from yesterdat at 11AM until present are working fine.