Search results

Yes, I did that. Still cautious though! Thanks.

Thanks for that. The system is entirely canonical, with no deviations that I am aware of. Keyboard is English UK. My comment about it being non-enterprise was wrong, though, I had too many screens open! It's on the enterprise subscription. I'm inclined to wait for the next minor update and...

Agreed... but it continually improves (on the whole!)

I can do (and have done) that, but as the system is canonical wondered if it was a Proxmox update issue that might occur more generally. This is our test non-enterprise machine.

Extract from Console output, attached: ,,, Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal 5.4.44-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.44-2-pve run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 5.4.44-2-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.44-2-pve update-initramfs...

There is? Under summary?

Thanks, I thought so but nice to have confirmed. Closed.

On one machine, running pve5to6 gives the following warning: WARN: KVM nested enabled. It will not be possible to live migrate the following running VMs to PVE 6: VMID(s) with cputype 'host' or 'max': 100 On this machine there is NO nested virtualisation but the CPU type is set to 'host'...

Thanks again for the reply. Um, I don't think I am mixing them, but I am certainly misunderstanding! My point is that the GPT disk is mountable on the host OK. In the post I referred to above you said: This is what I want to do as well, but I have not yet achieved this and cannot use...

Thanks for the reply. This is where I am stuck; fdisk will not pick up GPT disks... The Areca array appears as /dev/sda in the host. Here is what happens when I run parted: (parted) print Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk) Disk /dev/vda: 34.4GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B...

I have seen the thread at: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/3589-Using-local-harddisk-with-existing-data-as-storage but as this is old have started a new post. I have a large (14TB) Raid 6 on Areca array, partitioned with cgdisk (but could have been parted) and set up as per general...

We are running on on of these: http://www.google.co.uk/products/catalog?q=hp+dl385+g7&hl=en&prmd=iv&cr=countryUK|countryGB&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=11423412187971608975&ei=_4-jTLKcBczDswaV-JizCA&sa=X&oi=product_catalog_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD4Q8wIwAw# Results seem quite good. Make sure you...

Re: Boot problem after kernel upgrade while external USB drive connected - help, plea Duh! Of course! Yes you were quite right, it had written the MBR to the wrong drive. What I had overlooked is the Grub trashes the original MBR in this case... Thank you!

:: Resolved :: This is a very silly issue, but I'm posting for two reasons: 1. As a warning - don't do this! 2. To request help to resolve the issue as I am stuck. There was a recent 32-4 kernel upgrade released. As I had a machine on the bench at the time, I ran the upgrade and all was...

OK I will post any findings then :)

Anyone?

Hi, I'm new to KVM but like Proxmox and have been testing KVM in various circumstances also under CentOS and Ubuntu. As a result I'm building an XP farm on a new HP DL385 G7. After getting the missing battery for the controller (see other posts by me) I was still seeing somewhat disappointing...

See http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/4548-Poor-performance-on-HP-ProLiant-DL385-G7-12-core?highlight=performance for a similar issue; and the resolution (a battery!)

Just for the record, this brand-new machine seems 100% OK so far *despite* HP "support" refusing to agree that it would work. This is a 2-socket box with one 12-core AMD in it at present and I expect it should work well. If you order one make sure to order either a battery for the package...

Well, this was a real slap-head issue. The server came WITH battery-backed cache and RAM but WITHOUT the battery. I forgive Purchasing for not detecting this! Results after ordering and installing the battery and it getting charged (on 1.51 kernel): proxmox1:~# pveperf CPU BOGOMIPS...