Search results

With 5.4.101 on both host and guest so far no issue. VM file cache size has reached 11G and has been sitting there for a while, I'm relaunching previously failed backups.

* last cat /proc/meminfo; ps fauxwwww on the backup1 (PBS) VM ========= Fri 05 Mar 2021 08:44:34 AM CET ======== MemTotal: 12264260 kB MemFree: 162436 kB MemAvailable: 11107408 kB Buffers: 230920 kB Cached: 10694904 kB SwapCached: 20 kB Active...

I've got some more information : my setup is a physical server "pcstorage1" (Atom C2550, 16G ECC RAM, 6 4TB hdd) with PVE 6.3 RAIDZ2 UEFI boot with only one VM "backup1" running PBS 1.0.8 which has 12G RAM and 10TB ext4 UEFI system (virtio-scsi) I got the crash issue again on a large VM disk...

Hi, While using PBS 1.0.8 (server and client) to backup a directory with old VM images: proxmox-backup-client backup dir1.pxar:/mnt/old --verbose ... append chunks list len (64) append chunks list len (64) "dir1/vm1" "dir1/vm1/sdb.img" append chunks list len (64) ... append chunks list len...

UEFI install so no GRUB, only systemd-boot AFAIK: root@x:~# efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: 0004 ... Boot0003* Linux Boot Manager HD(2,GPT,755464f2-9b00-4f2d-9a81-98a455a69cc7,0x800,0x100000)/File(\EFI\systemd\systemd-bootx64.efi) Boot0004* Linux Boot Manager...

I did a fesh install of PVE 6.3 (UEFI, ZFS RAID1), then update/dist-upgrade, reboot, then I did zfs upgrade rpool : root@x:~# zpool version zfs-2.0.3-pve1 zfs-kmod-2.0.3-pve1 root@x:~# zpool upgrade This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. All pools are formatted using feature flags...

Yes it helps a lot, thanks! (we're all UEFI boot without grub, I'll test and report in the other thread)

Got the same web UI issue, and scrub fixed it, thanks! While looking a zpool status I noticed a suggestion about running zpool upgrade: pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: Some supported features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable...

Hi, thanks for your answer. I read this document and I'm not sure I'll be able to test a realistic set of conditions with HA as proposed as my time is limited, that's why I asked how to "manually" restart a VM from a known for sure failed/offline node on another one. On our current non proxmox...

Hi, I'm testing some edge cases with proxmox VE 6.3: I have a cluster p1 with three nodes node1 node2 node3, all use only a shared NFS (from another machine outside the cluster) for VM disk storage. VM 100 is running on node1. node2 and node3 have no VM running. Let's assume node1 fails...

I lightly tested the following patch and it seemed to work for my trunk VM port and not break my other VM: root@nuc3:/usr/share/perl5/PVE# diff -u Network.pm.orig Network.pm; diff -u QemuServer.pm.orig QemuServer.pm --- Network.pm.orig 2021-02-02 20:19:17.454498452 +0100 +++ Network.pm...

Yes but if we define proper trunks for VM ports it doesn't get through. Since proxmox UI doesn't allow for specifying ifupdown2 advanced VLAN options and you have to edit manually /etc/network/interfaces to for example select some VLANs instead of all it's not proxmox responsability to use the...

I tested your suggestion manually: # bridge -c vlan ... tap101i1 10 20 30 # bridge vlan add vid 1 dev tap101i1 # bridge -c vlan ... tap101i1 1 10 20 30 So your code will add tagged vlan 1 to the trunk according to iproute2 bridge (didn't know this was...

QinQ is another story :) We don't use it in our infrastructure currently. The tag= attribute can be given only once and it's ok since it specify the untagged vlan and there can be only one on a bridge port The issue is that proxmox cannot remove the current behaviour of adding untagged vlan 1...

Hi, Yes of course you can have untagged traffic VLAN 10 on one machine and untagged traffic VLAN 20 on another, that's what the tag= attribute is for, and you do not have to use separate bridges for that since "VLAN aware bridge" have been developped just for this purpose. Please reread the...

Yes I want to remove untagged traffic as it might be an unwanted communication channel between unrelated VM. For example let's say a VM has trunk VLAN 10 20 and another one trunk VLAN 30 40 so in principle they're completely isolated at L2 ethernet. If proxmox keeps adding untagged VLAN 1 to...

Looking at the source code of PVE it looks like adding untag 1 is done in all cases : https://github.com/proxmox/pve-common/blob/master/src/PVE/Network.pm#L235 $tag = 1 if !$tag; eval { run_command(['/sbin/bridge', 'vlan', 'add', 'dev', $iface, 'vid', $tag, 'pvid'...

Hi, I'm trying to trunk a subset of the host VLANs to a VM using proxmox VE 6.3-3 on debian 10. In the web UI there is only one option tag= for a VM interface which gives access to the given VLAN only as untagged inside the VM. If no tag= is set then the VM sees all the VLAN configured on the...

Thanks ! datacenter/node expand gives storage view with pbs and then indeed new vmid on restore .

Hi, testing PBS 1.0-1 (from ISO) together with PVE 6.3-3 (on debian 10 host) I'm not able to restore from a backup (of VM 100) to a new VM (eg VM 101)? The "VM" field of the VM/backup/restore popup menu is not editable, if I click on Restore I get "VM 100 - Restore. This will permanently erase...