Search results

Did you add an XP iso image to that CD ? If there there is no iso image, it won't boot. Alain

Sorry, but Windows XP can only boot as a KVM machine. Did you use that option when creating the VM ? And, in my 1.7 web interface, I cannot choose SCSI as CDROM. So what are you doing precisely ? Did you upload an XP CDROM iso on the server ? If you do not give more details, we cannot help...

After the night, still no errors, neither on the node (R610) where I installed the 2.6.32 kernel, nor the other one (R710), still with the the 2.6.35 kernel. So I tried to reinstall the 2.6.35 kernel on the R610, and after reboot, no more errors with this kernel, at least until now... So, it...

Or a problem with my new node... I noticed that since I installed 2.6.32 kernel on this node, I do not see anymore errors on the master node (R710), which stayed with the 2.6.35 kernel... Strange... Thanks for the hint ! Alain

I tried with 2.6.32 kernel on the R610, and the problem seems to not appear on this node with this kernel... srv-kvm3:~# pveversion -v pve-manager: 1.7-10 (pve-manager/1.7/5323) running kernel: 2.6.32-4-pve proxmox-ve-2.6.32: 1.7-30 pve-kernel-2.6.32-4-pve: 2.6.32-30 qemu-server: 1.1-28...

Yes, I can give it a try, at least on the R610, a new server, where there is currently no VM ruinning. I'll let you know. Thanks for the anwers. Alain

srv-kvm1:~# modinfo bnx2 filename: /lib/modules/2.6.35-1-pve/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09ax-5.0.0.j10.fw firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-5.0.0.j10.fw firmware: bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j15.fw firmware: bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-5.0.0.j3.fw firmware...

Another information, bnx2 module is indeed loaded (the right driver for this controller ?): srv-kvm1:/var/log# lsmod ... bnx2 66313 0

I should add that I have no problem to connect to the faulty servers using ssh, and that I cannot upload an iso image via web interface, but can do it via sFTP (Filezilla). Weird... Alain

Hi all, I have a cluster with four Dell servers, and am seeing network errors and experiencing web interface hangs on two of them of the last generation (PE R710 and PE R610). These errors do not appear on the other two, older servers (PE 2950 and PE 2900). PE R710 is the master node, and when...

I understand, but there could be some time before 2.0 would be released. There is certainly some developpement still to do, and then one or more beta before final release. And moreover, The migration path for existing installation could be hard to follow, or even a bit risky, if I consider all...

I cannot say for 2.6.32-4-pve kernel, as I use only 2.6.35 kernel, but with them I have : # cat config-2.6.35-1-pve |grep CONFIG_DEVTMPFS CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y # uname -a Linux srv-kvm3 2.6.35-1-pve #1 SMP Thu Dec 16 06:05:58 CET 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux So it seems to be...

I agree, it would be a step towards 2.0, as there was others, and this would ease at the end the migration to 2.0. Alain

Hi Udo, pve 2.x will be based on Squeeze (at least it was announced), but I see no problem to release a new 1.x (x>7) based on Squeeze, even if it does not have all the features announced for 2.x. In fact, only if it provided the points I mentionned (ext4, Dell OMSA support...), it will be...

Hi, Debian Squeeze is planned to be released on February 5/6. When can we expect a new version of Proxmox-ve based on Squeeze ? Will it takes weeks or days ? From my point of view, a proxmox-ve version based on squeeze would be interesting on at least two aspects : - ext4 as default file...

I can add that KVM was developed by Qumraned, which was bought by Red Hat two years ago. In contrast to Oracle, Red Hat always released the products it bought in close source, as GPL products. Red Hat make money from support. And Red Hat is very active in the development of KVM, which is the...

Shawn, you are kidding or it's a troll ? You are on a Proxmox forum here. Proxmox ve is a professional virtualization solution developped under GPL license. It is aimed at a professional solution, as it has for example a bare metal installer, like VMWARE ESX. It has also many nice features...

Yes it it helps : hertz:~# wget -O- "http://ftp.sara.nl/debian_sara.asc" | apt-key add - --2010-12-03 10:06:57-- http://ftp.sara.nl/debian_sara.asc Resolving ftp.sara.nl... 145.100.29.132 Connecting to ftp.sara.nl|145.100.29.132|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK...

For the Ubuntu repository, I tried, but it failed, complaining it is a 'sid repository'... Alain

Yes, I did it, but only for dellomsa 5.5, and I am not entirely satisfied, so I did it only on a node of my cluster. The problem is that each time I run 'apt-get update', I get a warning message : W: GPG error: http://ftp.sara.nl dell Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified...