Search results

You may place a feature-request-"bug" over there: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/describecomponents.cgi?product=pve . (If you do: please cross-link to here.) Currently there is no good solution, as far as I know. But you can either a) manually disable "Backup [x]" for each large Hard Disk or b)...

Du scheinst ja einen großen Schritt vorwärts gekommen zu sein. Mit dem zusammenbauen der mdadm-Fragmente kann ich leider nicht helfen. Viel Erfolg!

You should really ask https://shop.proxmox.com/contact.php for a recommended/safe procedure. Probably you are not the first person with this "problem". Please post their answer here :-)

Dann darfst du "sudo" einfach ignorieren. Komplett. Mehr Rechte als "root" geht ja nicht ;-) Offenbar ist irgendwas an deiner Installation anders als üblich. Der Such-Pfad sollte so aussehen: ~# lsb_release -c; echo $PATH Codename: trixie...

Das ist ein Befehl, der nicht von "normalen" Nutzern verwendet werden soll. Er liegt daher dort: ~# which mdadm /usr/sbin/mdadm "/usr/sbin/" ist möglicherweise nicht im Pfad von deinem Nutzer enthalten. Du brauchst außerdem root-Rechte, um mit mdadm etwas anfangen zu können. Dazu verwendet man...

Ja, das mag gerne sein. Solange alle Geräte "freundlich" sind, ist alles in Ordnung. Aber wenn irgendein Gerät Unfug im anderen Netz treiben will, dann kann es das - ohne dich (oder den Router) zu fragen. Dazu kommen ARP-Broadcasts, die dann "Abkürzungen" annoncieren und die momentan auf dem...

Man könnte das entsprechende Paket installieren...? apt -s install mdadm Aber Vorsicht: die Bedienung/Nutzung ist nicht trivial.

Damit machst du einen Kurzschluss zwischen den beiden Netzen. Das führt oft zu "interessanten" Effekten... und eliminiert die vermutlich gewünschte Trennung.

See also https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4367

It (obviously) aimed at small systems with only a few disks ;-) Sure. And so does a RaidZ1 based pool with 10*4 drives = 10 vdevs ;-) Correct! And it is great to have new possibilities. Maybe. Probably there are some data hoarders with many drives. Note that the reference page...

You did not state if you followed any documentation, so I need to mention that you may find some hints over there: https://pbs.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_3_to_4

So..., with fleecing enabled everything is fine? Then leave it turned on and call it a day ;-) Some cheap consumer disks (SSD and NVMe) go easily into a "too slow"/"stuttering"/"high delay" mode. When such a device is really busy to supply the data to a backups job it may not be able to...

Personally I will never use DHCP for a server. There are static examples in the doc, including one for bonding: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#sysadmin_network_bond

I do not use that one but I believe it is meant to be helpful in an air-gapped environment: https://pom.proxmox.com/

Possibly the actually available LAN is different now? E.g. it uses a different IP-Address range? I've tried to put some debugging tips here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/fabu-no-network-connectivity-after-installation-or-after-switching-the-router-can-not-load-the-web-gui-in-a-browser.160091/

The linked documentation would also work if a physical disk dies completely and you buy a new one. The documentation describes using "replace" to re-add a new disk. This means you should not "detach/remove" the disk first. Actually it does not matter at all - in any way you destroy one side...

Schade! Aber Canonical ändert ja auch gelegentlich die Strategien... (Mein neuestes Ubuntu ist 24.04.4 LTS) Obwohl... hier wird es bereits für "Resolute Raccoon" gelistet: https://packages.ubuntu.com/resolute/linux-virtual ... mit einer Dependency auf "linux-image-7.0.0-10-generic", also kein...

Mmmmhh... This specific line: comes from a "Directory" storage with "backup" flag set. In my task logs I can see lines like INFO: creating Proxmox Backup Server archive 'vm/1123/2026-03-23T06:46:30Z' ---- Okay, one step back. How do you initiate the backup process? I am usually preparing...

Yes. A snapshot makes sure that the whole dataset has a consistent state. And if that's not clear: only the differences (the modified data) will be transferred. "zfs send/receive" is fast because of this. "rsync" operates on another level, one step up to the file system layer. It is filesystem...

That's... not the way ZFS usually works. It needs to have identically sized disks. Of course this is Linux and "anything goes". But any "creative" idea to use all the space will possibly lead to trouble in the future. Manual partitioning and then creating multiple pools with these partitions...