Search results

You have pools with different names. (( And this prevents replication which is really annoying :-( )) Migration of running VMs allows me to select a specific storage on the target Migration of LXC does not offer this to me At the end... backup/restore should work. There is no easy...

Dein "allinkl" redet mit dem konfigurierten Emailserver, dazu hast du im Einrichtungsdialog deine Zugangsdaten eingegeben. Dieser Mechanismus funktioniert nur innerhalb des Proxmox-Kontextes. "sendmail" ist eine lokal laufendes Programm, welches üblicherweise einen ebenfalls lokal laufenden MTA...

I do not know how many nodes you utilize. If you have only three of them: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ceph-performance-with-consumer-grade-samsung-ssd.179948/post-834586

That's worst design possible. Beside the too cheap devices... Look at one node: when one OSD fails, the other one on the same node has to take over the data from the dead one. It can not be sent to another node because there are already copies on all other nodes as there is no fourth node. With...

Nice approach :-) Even though you have redundant switches I would recommend to prepare a separate wire (not a virtual LAN, 1 GBit/s is sufficient) for one of your multiple corosync rings. Disclaimer: your approach is multiple levels above my usual stuff :-)

It's not clear if you know the following page: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Windows_2025_guest_best_practices - maybe some of those hints are helpful for you...

There is no routing inside of a single IP network. All traffic is forwarded inside the bridge from VMa to VMb in the very same way it is done in a physical switch. To force a VM/LXC to send all packets to the router you would need to setup a /30 network for each one. That's the clean and...

Why not virtualize that idea? Create some VMs. Choose a "simple" OS without many bells and whistles. Update them and install relevant software - while being connected to the "normal" LAN. Make snapshots/backups. Setup some bridges without a hardware NIC assigned. Connect the NIC (more than one...

My very first PBS used only rotating rust. First it worked great. After putting a few TB of actual data on it I had exactly that experience. The listing of backups failed with timeout. Trying it immediately again would succeed - because most part of the metadata was already read and stored in...

Probably it's a VM under PVE ;-)

Is it? The relevant drivers for that virtual NIC are already baked in by default? This very old page is irrelevant nowadays? https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Paravirtualized_Network_Drivers_for_Windows Some minutes later: I've just started a (rarely used) Win11 VM and it shows me "Red Hat VirtIO...

Search for "journalctl"; the journal has replaced the classic syslog in Debian 13 / Trixie. Use journalctl -f to watch it live. To see the latest output of the previous boot: journalctl -b -1 -e = show the end (-e) of the previous (-1) boot. "-2" for the one before the last one and so on...

Well... it is a virtual device. Capabilities reported may be different than the hardware implements. Did you actually try to transfer more than 1 GBit/s? Give it a try - using iperf3 for example.

To make it PVE related: if the NIC runs under Debian it will probably work with Proxmox. Create a corresponding bridge, add that VM, install virtio drivers and... call it a day. Disclaimer: have have zero Mellanox experience...

Ich verwende Pangolin seit etwa einem Jahr. Allerdings hat das Gürteltier immer noch nicht meinen lokalen npm vollständig ersetzt - weil ich schlicht zu faul dazu bin ;-) Der Knackpunkt bei Pangolin ist, dass er komplett ohne Löcher in der Firewall bzw. Port forwarding von außen nach innen...

Sorry, keine Ahnung. Aber wenn der Storage nur zweimal pro Sekunde mit dem PBS redet, wird das nichts Vernünftiges.

Reine Vermutungen: Deine VMs haben ja nun eine eigene, private IP Adresse in einem Netz, welches nicht außerhalb des PVE geroutet wird. Korrekt? Dann ist die übliche Lösung: NAT/Masquerading. Für ein "normales" Setup schaust du hier...

Are you running this command as a user or as root? (Use "su -" or "sudo -i" to become root.) For this class of problems please post the whole command line (including the prompt) and the full output verbatim (and in ...-tags).

It is worth to note that KSM only kicks in when more than 80 % of the system RAM is actually in use. (Default setting.) https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Dynamic_Memory_Management#KSM_in_action (( Edit: oops - old thread. It was presented as "new/modified/new post" to my feed reader, hence my...

Interesting, did not know that...