Search results

you can edit manually /etc/network/interfaces and add: iface <vnetname> address X.X.X.X/X I'll be merged with the sdn config on reload

the vm traffic is goinf through the vxlan (vxlan_remoteip ...), so it's use peers ip address. if you want to split management && vm traffic on 2 nic, you need to setup 2 differents ip address on each host on different subnet. (1 for management, 1 for peers). Also, don't need vmbr0 or vmbr1...

systemd v256 -> not on debian13, so not on proxmox

Running 5000vms with 100 nodes since 5years. (I have made the original evpn code for it)

About pdm, Disaster recovery is on the roadmap. Evpn central configuration is already available in 1.0. If you need other vpn mesh, they need to be added in pve sdn first

maybe your hardware raid have writeback cache ? what is your ssd model ? datacenter grade ssd with supercapacitor ? (zfs will run poorly on consumer ssd). 0% pressure is totally fine, it should be 0% to have good performance.

you shouldn't use consumer ssd like Samsung evo with zfs. zfs is doing synchronous write, and consumer ssd don't have a supercapacitor to keep sync writes in memory cache before writing the nand cell. (it's really something like 200~400iops on theses drive with 20000 iops with datacenter...

"I'm assuming defining static routes to get back to the VMs from external is perfectly okay, but we're going to see about getting bgp set up on our switches" If you want to reach the evpn network from outside, if need indeed routes to the evpn network. (so static routes, or bgp learned routes...

the "evpn controller", is deploying config for evpn+bgp (they are only a bgp daemon in frr, but different peers for bgp or evpn layer), with same ASN for both evpn/bgp peers. but if you need create custom bgp configuration (e-bgp, different ASN , different peers for bgp,...) you can add...

is it possible to use oidc with your AD/entra ? I'm not sure about smartcard with browser, but it's working fine with our security keys.

they an issue on their github about evpn and their new unified startup script (race between zebra daemon not 100% started before bgpd daemon is starting , so some routes are not registered in kernel , until you restart manually the bgp daemon again) https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/19756

1= 1 core, 2= cores, ... the load average shouldn't be more than the total number of cores of your host.

you have the new pressure stats in pve9, which is almost the same than CPU readyness. (0 is ok, over 0 mean than your vm cpu need to wait ). Same for storage && memory pressure. no alerting is available in pve yet, you need to use external monitoring tool

this is strange, the vm should be started directly after the move. You don't have added start delay in vm options ?

They are still optimisation not yet implemented in qcow2 on lvm share (mainly the cache size), it could impact the performance with disk > 300Gb. But it should impact so much the performance. do you have tried with raw format to compare instead qcow2? also, windows virtio driver could have...

because you can't mount a ntfs filesystem on 2 machines at the same time....you are going to kill it if you do this...

what is your cpu usage during the bench ? currently iothread use only 1core, so you could be cpu limited in rand4k. (I'm working on it to add support for the new multithreading feature ). It could explain the difference, if hyper-v is able to use multiple cores by disk.

It should come in the future with proxmox datacenter manager. (2 differents cluster + storage replication ). Not sure It'll be ready for 1.0 , but I'm pretty sure that the feature will be available in 2016. For now, you need to replicate the storage yourself (depending of the storage techno...

if your fleecing storage is full, sure, you'll got io-error. But it's helping too to avoid slowdown during backup if your pbs is slow. for example, production is on nvme, and pbs is on hdd. You'll have slowdown when backup is running if write occur on a block not yet saved. With fleecing, if...

The lock is managed by proxmox code directly. (through pmxcfs/corosync). You can't delete 2 lvm volumes at the same time.