Search results

So using active backup is still dropping. I’m going to rebuild today with a dedicated cluster network. Just so I’m not crazy, I can have a two node cluster right? Even though my ultimate goal is 6, I need to start rebuilding with pve 5. But two node shouldn’t drop consistently?

Ok hold on ... I just read this in the manual ... "If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding interfaces, other modes are unsupported." I am using the LAN network for the cluster as well, something Ive done...

Then the second it drops I get a lot of this in the logs: May 05 08:06:34 SUNFIRE corosync[1989]: notice [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 7bf May 05 08:06:34 SUNFIRE corosync[1989]: [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 7bf May 05 08:06:34 SUNFIRE corosync[1989]: notice [TOTEM ] Retransmit List: 7bf May 05...

Heres some more info from syslog: May 05 07:35:26 MAGNETO pmxcfs[4114]: [dcdb] notice: members: 1/4114 May 05 07:35:26 MAGNETO pmxcfs[4114]: [status] notice: members: 1/4114 May 05 07:35:26 MAGNETO corosync[4133]: [QUORUM] This node is within the non-primary component and will NOT provide any...

Hey there, So I have a small cluster using Proxmox 5.1-52. Every 20 minutes or so the cluster drops. I see this in the cluster logs. Ideas? Both servers have bonded NIC in RR mode connected to meshed network switches. This problem never happened with PVE3, but now I'm seeing it. Is there some...

I'm still seeing alot of spam come through the PMG. After review of our file, were you able to find other ways to tighten up our spam server? Here is an example of some headers that have come through. Based on this, shouldnt the PMG have caught it? Or am I missing something? X-Spf-Status...

Sorry for the delay: If you look at the online help within PMG 5, then look under the section for Proxmox Mail Gateway Manual Pages you'll see the help section for pmgqm. That has a bunch of different options for sending quarantines. While I don't see a option to specify a time range, you could...

Update: The upgrade to 5.0-55 went successful, and now I can modify the headers as expected! Re: the negative spam count; that was because I had the incoming / external ports backwards. When I enabled 25 as the inbound it started reporting correctly. All seems better, now tweaking it to be...

How can I make the PMG even tighter? We seem to be getting more spam still slipping through the filter. I want it to be almost "too" tight. Is it possible I could send you my backup file so you can check our settings for validity? Thanks!

Just to report, it appears I had my rules in the wrong order, now it makes more sense!

Ok so I did all that, and heres a screenshot of my CLI. All look good? Now when I reboot the server it doesn't show 5.0-6? Thank you very much for your attention as well!

I must be doing something wrong; I copy and paste this, but I still get the same results. Also, the link you sent is for proxmox-ve? Or do they share the same packages?

I am getting these results ... Reading package lists... Done W: The repository 'https://enterprise.proxmox.com/debian/pmg stretch Release' does not have a Release file. N: Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use. N: See apt-secure(8)...

I found another situation where the regex is causing input errors. Under the "what" action group, create a new group called "Keyword" and then choose Match Field. I want to put a two word keyword in the Match Field Value box. It won't let me. Thanks!

root@pmg01:~# pmgversion -v proxmox-mailgateway: 5.0-4 (API: 5.0-43/51c9b72f, running kernel: 4.13.13-1-pve) pmg-api: 5.0-43 pmg-gui: 1.0-20 proxmox-spamassassin: 3.4.1-53 proxmox-widget-toolkit: 1.0-9 pve-kernel-4.13.13-1-pve: 4.13.13-31 libpve-http-server-perl: 2.0-8 lvm2: 2.02.168-2...

Could this be a bug also? The negative report of spam >= 10?

Bug posted. Thanks!

Attached. Should I assume that this is supposed to be anything 10 or higher? And also see the spam quarantine for my account, these ones in the 20s shouldn't even be quarantined right? Thanks for your attention! EDIT: It might be working, I may just be impatient. I'll keep an eye on it...

There is a rule to block spam at level 10; however anything with a value higher than 10 is getting quarantined. Is this a bug? Shouldnt it expect to block anything higher than 10, and not just equal to 10? Thanks.

Im just trying to add the SPAM level to the header and I am getting these errors. What does this mean? What patten is expected? This is on PMG 5 beta. Also note that I can't even go back to the original setting "SPAM: __SUBJECT__" without it giving me these errors also. Thanks