VictorSTS's latest activity
-
VictorSTS reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] PVE 9.2 ARM64 on ASUS GX10 (GB10): 6 GB/s of NVMe/TCP out of the box, 29 GB/s after two kernel flags with
Like.
One more GX10 post, the last one for now. After battling the black screen, the hard resets and the power cap, we were finally able to see what this box and PVE on arm64 can do. Out of the box, the kernel initiator managed NVMe/TCP reads at 6.3... -
VictorSTS replied to the thread Ceph OSDs not being able to be configured in fully routed Environment.What we do is simply edit ceph.conf once the first MON has been provisioned to move both Public and Cluster networks from /32 to /24 (sed -i 's/\/32$/\/24/g' /etc/pve/ceph.conf), then you can keep provisioning Ceph as usual. Edit: forgot to...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread WebUI Syslog Font.IIRC, the change to monospace font was introduced exactly on pve-manager v9.2.4 + proxmox-widget-toolkit 5.2.6. Verify those packages with pveversion -v on every node. I remember seeing something related to a new structured view on v9.2.4 on the...
-
I'd recommend trying to reproduce this directly on the PVE host, bypassing the VM. Allocate a raw volume with pvesm alloc and test against the block device directly (or mkfs and mount it). My suspicion is that LVM doesn't clear extents on...
-
we already have previous reports about HPE MSA (and Dell) appliances misbehaving in exactly this fashion - they advertise support for zeroing unmap, but only do it when the request matches some conditions, and simply ignore the zeroing part...
-
VictorSTS reacted to sbarmen's post in the thread Proxmox on Oracle Cloud Free Tier Ampere (ARM) with Like.
Well I found a way! Since now formally arm is supported I tried again. And this time I got it to work. Cloud flare tunnels would probably work @yankluf. I have been working on a writeup blog article. Have a look if you are curious...
-
VictorSTS reacted to fweber's post in the thread Cephx Key Migration Procedure and Ceph 19.2 Squid Going EOL Soon with Like.
An update: The Ceph packages and accompanying pve-manager and pve-docs updates are now available in the Proxmox VE 9 enterprise repositories as well.
-
VictorSTS reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Why LVM-Thin Cannot Be Shared Storage in Proxmox with Like.
Hi Everyone, Every few months someone asks some version of "why can't I use LVM-thin on my shared SAN LUN?" Thick LVM works fine as shared storage, but has no native snapshots. LVM-thin has snapshots but is local-only... it's natural to wonder...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Cephx Key Migration Procedure and Ceph 19.2 Squid Going EOL Soon.Yes. Your choice to keep your "franken-cluster" :) or go for a better manageable / supportable configuration. I would remove Ceph and use ZFS replication, but don't want to lecture anyone or take the thread off topic. I would add PVE to that PBS...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Cephx Key Migration Procedure and Ceph 19.2 Squid Going EOL Soon.@tschmidt @kanemari I would remove the custom mon and install PVE on that external host/VM, add it to the cluster and use PVE Ceph integration. If that extra mon is running inside the cluster, get an external host. @kanemari if I were you I...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Cephx Key Migration Procedure and Ceph 19.2 Squid Going EOL Soon with Like.
Recent security findings and fixes in Ceph make it necessary to upgrade ceph and migrate authentication keys from the aes to the aes256k cipher. This is to address weaknesses in the old Cephx authentication method, especially if your Ceph service...
-
VictorSTS reacted to taerarenai's post in the thread Proxmox host becomes partially unresponsive after random periods of uptime with Like.
There's probably a saying that exists in every country - if you have nothing good to say, dont say anything. Ive read the pages there a long time ago and, as mentioned, tried the fixes. There's still people in that thread encountering the issue...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox announces global 24/7 enterprise support and launches Proxmox North America Inc. with Like.
We are pleased to share two major milestones that will help us better serve our customers and partners worldwide. Global 24/7 enterprise support Starting October 19, 2026, Proxmox Enterprise Support will be available around the clock, 365 days a...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Official status of support for multiple backup solutions.Because we could suppose that there is no support, which seems more or less expected given the way QEMU creates backups, but we we can as well think that there is no problem running different backup solutions given that no vendor or PVE docs...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Official status of support for multiple backup solutions.Sorry, I don't understand what you mean with that. I'm asking about the official support of Proxmox PBS to do backups of QEMU VMs in a PVE cluster that is also backed up by other backup solution (Hornet, Veeam, Nakivo), whether of the same VMs...
-
VictorSTS posted the thread Official status of support for multiple backup solutions in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.Which is the official support status of doing PVE QEMU backups with PBS and other backup solutions? Specifically, would like to know the support status from Proxmox PBS for: Veeam Hornetsecurity (Altaro) Nakivo There are a few use cases that...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with Like.
There is now a newer pve-manager with version 9.2.12 available on the pve-test repo and a backport of that as 8.4.22 for PVE 8's pvetest repo, matching our respective test repo of the ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle releases. There is some better...
-
This should be the same for VMs and CTs as the HA Manager handles affinity rules the same for both. In a quick test, the migration blocker with the same node affinity rule as above was shown to me for both VMs and CTs, so I couldn't move either...
-
Hallo Daniel! Done https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7893 https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6593 (this ones already existing but also useful) https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6960 (already existed, commented on...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.It should not let you migrate neither the CT nor the VM. If it did, once you migrate a VM from pve-4 to pve-2, in the next ha cycle (~10 seconds) HA would say "this VM on pve-2 has another node with higher priority and the node is up, let's...