VictorSTS's latest activity
-
Fixed versions are available in the enterprise repositories as well now. -
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with
Like.
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only. Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64... -
VictorSTS reacted to christophe's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] What Replaces SRM and vSphere Replication on Proxmox? with Like.
Hi @bbgeek17, In our context, we are preparing configurations intended to be instantiated by non-specialist departments; we are therefore prioritizing ease of implementation. 1. At the very beginning we followed multiple docs, mainly...
-
VictorSTS reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] What Replaces SRM and vSphere Replication on Proxmox? with Like.
Hi Everyone, Disaster recovery keeps coming up with folks moving off VMware, usually as some version of "what replaces SRM?" We've answered pieces of this in threads for years, so we finally sat down and wrote the whole thing up properly...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Nested PVE (on PVE host) Kernel panic Host injected async #PF in kernel mode.Disabling disk swap is enough. PF are still enabled when using zram as swap and the problem has never happened with that enabled, so the problem is related to disk swap on the host but can't really point my finger to a specific component (kernel...
-
VictorSTS reacted to mfederanko's post in the thread In Proxmox 9.2.3 what is this UI checkbox for? with Like.
host-managed=0 should be the closest equivalent to PVE8 behavior, though PVE9 does include logic to auto-detect if the host or guest should configure the network and it is usually not necessary to specify it. Specifically, it checks the existence...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment now available for 64-bit ARM (arm64)! with Like.
We are excited to announce the first release of Proxmox Virtual Environment with official support for a second CPU architecture: 64-bit ARM (arm64/aarch64). Until now, Proxmox VE was available for x86-64 (amd64) only. Proxmox VE 9.2 for arm64...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Nested PVE (on PVE host) Kernel panic Host injected async #PF in kernel mode.In my case, it works correctly as soon as disk swap is disabled in the host (i.e. works fine with zram or with no swap, haven't tested zswap yet).
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Feedback on the bulk-restart feature of ceph (9.2.5).That feels like a documentation error, as in every other Ceph upgrade guide "ceph osd require-osd-release <new_release>" is used just after every OSD has been restarted.
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread New Debug Symbol (dbgsym) Package Repository with Like.
Today we're introducing a dedicated repository for debug symbol packages, reachable at https://dbgsym.proxmox.com/. Debug symbol packages (named <package>-dbgsym) contain the detached debug information for their matching binary package. They are...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Proxmox + CEPH - using same NICs but different VLANs for public/cluster networks.That's what I usually do: using 2 vlans over the same bond add the benefit that if you ever need to separate the cluster network to a different bond, no Ceph configuration changes will have to be made (i.e. add the cluster network and restart...
-
VictorSTS reacted to Neobin's post in the thread Call for Feature: Native LINSTOR Support with Like.
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/supported-way-to-extend-the-pve-web-ui-for-a-third-party-package.185017/post-861469
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread DHCP in Proxmox.During PVE install, the ISO installer will try to get an IP from DHCP. If that succeeds, it will configure that IP as static for vmbr0. As you are not very experienced, I suggest that you create a DHCP reservation assigned to the MAC of your PVE...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread DHCP in Proxmox.Wouldn't it be more precise to say that PVE on DHCP isn't supported without other tweaks even on single node setups? Some services require to resolve the host name to an IP that is currently assigned to the host to work properly.
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Proxmox behind HAProxy SSL backend and frontend results in no encryption at all..You are using an http mode frontend with a tcp mode backend for pve, which doesn't make much sense: haproxy will terminate the ssl tunnel and send clear text traffic to PVE which won't work. Change the backend mode to http and use something like...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread ServiceNow discovery.In any case, the "ServiceNow" manual surely details what kind of access and privileges the user needs. In the end PVE is "just" Debian, so they should have clearly defined instructions on what's needed for ServiceNow to work properly in this...
-
More details here: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/3286
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Know little about Gluster, so can't compare features/performance, but wanted to clarify some points regarding Ceph (again): Among other tasks, Ceph MON will provide a copy of the CRUSH map to every component in the Ceph cluster, including...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support! with Like.
FWIW, forky isn't released, and it's still about half a year until the freeze period starts, and until then lots of packages can still get dropped. Debian cares a bit less about the reasoning we had here, there is no support (and thus liability)...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.This is absolutely needed and has to be very precise. I.e. which exact metric is used for both CPU and Memory "loads": CPU load vs CPU usage vs CPU pressure, Mem usage vs Mem pressure. Currently testing CRS in lab and it seems to allow a node to...