VictorSTS's latest activity
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with
Like.
There is now a newer pve-manager with version 9.2.12 available on the pve-test repo and a backport of that as 8.4.22 for PVE 8's pvetest repo, matching our respective test repo of the ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle releases. There is some better... -
This should be the same for VMs and CTs as the HA Manager handles affinity rules the same for both. In a quick test, the migration blocker with the same node affinity rule as above was shown to me for both VMs and CTs, so I couldn't move either...
-
Hallo Daniel! Done https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7893 https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6593 (this ones already existing but also useful) https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6960 (already existed, commented on...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Questions about the dynamic CRS.It should not let you migrate neither the CT nor the VM. If it did, once you migrate a VM from pve-4 to pve-2, in the next ha cycle (~10 seconds) HA would say "this VM on pve-2 has another node with higher priority and the node is up, let's...
-
VictorSTS reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Ceph CVEs – keyring rotation strongly advised, probably required in the future with Like.
This can be done gradually, but needs a bit of care. We're currently in the process of finishing a migration helper tool and providing documentation for how to do this.
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread PVE 9.2 + Ceph Tentacle 20.2.4: RBD operations fail because pve-storage passes removed --auth_supported option.@yangsm AFAIK, Ceph 20.2.4 / 19.2.6 packages are only available in Test repository, you should avoid using it unless for testing. Proxmox is working on the process to rotate the keys [1], although we still don't know the details, on paper it...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread PBS on RAIDZ2+HDD, no special file.I'm not aware of a bug that won't allow install, mind posting a link to some reference?
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread PBS on RAIDZ2+HDD, no special file.You right, somehow I understood that there are SSD for OS but not SSD to dedicate to SD, so imagined that OP wanted to devote some space on those SSD for SD.
-
This is only HDD, zero SSD. (As of #1) Having a "separate" Special Device on the very same spindles makes no sense. Actually we know not much at all. What actual drives are available? How many? How many (unused) connectors has the controller...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread PBS on RAIDZ2+HDD, no special file.I would put the RAID controller in JBOD / IT mode to convert it to an HBA, the use ZFS for both the OS and special device. Remember that ZFS isn't supported on RAID controllers/LUNs. When installing PVE/PBS, set the disk size to ~50G, should be...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread PBS on RAIDZ2+HDD, no special file.Yes, but not every single time. Depends essentially on the size of the datastore, how much work PBS has to do (i.e. backup once a day vs once an hour, many replicas, many verify, etc), and how much time you have to run GC, which is the task that...
-
Yes that's true; I removed some lines because of posting limitations. Also only no-subscription repository is enabled (besides debian repos of course)..
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Upgrade from Proxmox 9.1 to 9.2.Yes, but there should be a "Hit:" line for every repo. Maybe OP didn't post the whole apt update output. Edit: we posted at once :)
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Upgrade from Proxmox 9.1 to 9.2.In the apt update output above I'm missing a line referencing Proxmox repositories, although the apt list --upgradable does indeed show upgradable Proxmox packages. Are you sure the Proxmox repositories are correctly configured?
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread kernel 7.0 performance issue with zfs pools.Check this point of view: there's no ZFS without ARC: it's and inherent part of ZFS architecture and ZFS performance is designed around it, so you do relay on it and expect it to behave correctly to get the most of your ZFS. Like why not raise...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread kernel 7.0 performance issue with zfs pools.Finally got a chance to check on this. The problem seems to be related to a recently reported bug [1] that causes ARC to evict all/most of it's contents erroneously, even when there's plenty of RAM available. This causes ARC to almost never...
-
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread SQL Server 2022 database corruption.That's good news, but remember that you are using an unsupported storage stack that will sooner or later give you some issue that no one will be willing to investigate / fix. Take your time to rebuild your storage to a proper ZFS setup, which...
-
VictorSTS reacted to Darkangeel_hd's post in the thread Nested PVE (on PVE host) Kernel panic Host injected async #PF in kernel mode with Like.
We kinda know why the problem happens, more or less... if the VM tries to access a memory zone that the host has currently swapped a PF will be generated so that the guest kernel can do something else on that vCPU while waiting, this behavior is...
-
VictorSTS replied to the thread Shared SSD for OS & datastore acceleration.My option is: Install PVE using ~50G with a mirror of SSD. Leave the rest unused. Coinstall PBS (add repo, add package) [1]. From PVE, add a RAIDz/RAID10 (capacity vs performance decision, although on that hardware won't be too relevant). Could...
-
Fixed versions are available in the enterprise repositories as well now.
