Good question, it made me do a short googling. Following older stackoverflow thread from the results has some interesting points:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/269098/silent-disk-errors-and-reliability-of-linux-swap
The basic argument...
just to add a bit of context and hopefully make things a bit more clear for future readers
not quite - the output comes from listing the entry in the `debian/NEWS` file from the Debian Upstream zfs-linux source package...
Nobody claimed that it won't work. UdoB even mentioned the relevant page from the Proxmox wiki. The point being is, that ProxmoxVE isn't designed as a desktop OS so it's more work to make it behave like one. Now there are some usecases for it...
Moving the config file doesn't stop the VM; nothing watches /etc/pve and kills a running kvm process when its config moves away. All you've changed is which node PVE thinks owns the guest, so the process on vm1 carries on running and writing to...
Wenn man beim Installieren ZFS für das Betriebssystem auswählt nicht mehr, dann wird seit ProxmoxVE 8.1 durch den Installer der Wet auf 10% des verbauten Speichers, aber maximal 16 GB gesetzt...
If I recall correctly it's entirely possible to use ZFS with HW-RAID if (and only if!) you don't build a pool but instead uses the virtual disc provided by the RAID-Controller in a single-device-pool. @Falk R. mentioned such a setup in the...
https://shop.proxmox.com/ should help you. If you need a local supplier have a look at https://proxmox.com/en/partners/find-partner/all/filter/partners/partner/partner-type-filter/reseller-partner?f=6
apt policy zfs-linux might be of interest.
Also relevant: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/zfs-packages-updated-by-debian-repository-is-this-expected.185983/
That's trying to pull software from experimental??? (Or is this possibly pve-test? I am not using that one anywhere...)
Please check your repository sources. There is no zfs-linux in "Debian Trixie" / "stable"...
For a laptop it is better suited than PVE - from my own limited experience. I have it on a Dell XPS15 and Qubes lets me run a highly secure environment. Each Xen Domain is similar like a VM. I have separate ones for...
Fair, "müssen" war zu hart, "sollte man dringend" trifft es besser. Auf einem Special Device landen die Metadaten und je nach special_small_blocks auch noch die kleinen Blöcke, also viele kleine synchrone Writes. Ohne PLP muss die SSD jedes...
Can be closed .. in one of my experiments I set up a OpnSense firewall and the video I followed included setting up the pve-firewall with pretty restrictive rules ... I must have forgotten since I deleted OpnSense shortly after setup ... but...
PVE doesn't have a 'supported' list, I am assuming this is a list of VMs you're wanting to export from an existing system like vSphere?
You can run essentially any x86-64 OS, so all of those are fine. The OS Type field in PVE isn't a...
Ja, Spiegel sind essentiell! Und PLP ist wertvoll. PLP verhindert nicht nur Datenverlust, sondern erhöht auch die Performance drastisch. (Nachtrag: ... und die Lebensdauer...) Ja, ich weiß, dass du das weißt. ;-)
Ich würde allerdings das...
@ThoSo hat recht, den 9550-8i gibt es so nicht. @oelk, lass auf der Kiste mal storcli64 /c0 show laufen, dann steht der echte Typ drin. Das ist wichtig: 9500 ist ein reiner HBA (ideal für ZFS), 9540 kann 0/1/10, und erst ab 9560 gibt es RAID5/6...
Damit würde ich:
bei der PVE-Installation nur auf das Blech installieren, und zwar auf zwei Spiegel, fka "Raid10". Am Ende ist jede dieser vier Platten bootfähig.
später, wenn alles läuft, die beiden kleineren Platten (SSD?) als "Special...