UdoB's latest activity
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Netzwerk alle paar Tage weg. Proxmox und VMs nicht mehr erreichbar with
Like.
Naja, bei sicherheitsrelevanten Bugs geht es ja darum, dass man da im Zweifelsfall nicht bemerkt, dass es ungebetene Gäste auf dem System gibt ;) In jeden neuen Kernel sind tausende Bugfixes drin und die Kernel-Entwickler vertreten die Meinung... -
UdoB reacted to Falk R.'s post in the thread Netzwerk alle paar Tage weg. Proxmox und VMs nicht mehr erreichbar with Like.
Daher erst den 6.14er testen, eventuell läuft es dann ja sauber. Wenn man sich an die Grundlegenden Empfehlungen des BSI hält und den Hypervisor in einem Getrennten Managementnetz hinter einer Firewall betreibt, schätze ich das Risiko erst einmal...
-
The "?" in the GUI can indicate two things: a) "pvestatd" daemon has trouble collecting information. This is usually related to storage misconfiguration (network or otherwise) b) trouble connecting to that particular node You can perform the...
-
Hello, Thanks four your answer. With all informations you gave me and and considering the equipment I currently own I finally decide to install PBS on a dedicated VM. I made a passtrough of the disk by ID, it was pretty simple to do it and It...
-
I suspect that you are mixing up the layers. The encryption and deduplication in Proxmox Backup Server is filesystem-agnostic so it has nothing to do with the encyption you do on the ProxmoxVE host or inside a vm and especially nothing to do with...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Server Upgrade - Unterstützung/Beratung bei Auswahl der Hardware with Like.
Relevante Details sind power-loss-protection ( plp ) und DWPD, da kann man bei Geizhals nach filtern und mal schauen, ob da die von dir ausgewählten Samsungmodelle auftauchen: https://geizhals.de/?cat=hdssd&xf=7161_Power-Loss...
-
UdoB reacted to fabian's post in the thread PBS integrity check: is the hash computed on PVE or on PBS? with Like.
there are actually multiple checksums. chunks contain a CRC (verified on each read of the chunk) and have a digest (that the chunk is referenced by). both are calculated on the client side, the CRC is verified by the server upon upload, the...
-
UdoB replied to the thread Problem with WEB GUI.Check and restart -if it is not "active (running)"- pveproxy: ~# systemctl status pveproxy.service ~# systemctl restart pveproxy.service ~# systemctl status pveproxy.service
-
UdoB reacted to janus57's post in the thread Regarding the installation failure of Debian 13.1 CT with Like.
Hi, The latest version (in no-subscription) is pve-manager/9.0.6 which fix your issue. It's fixed in pve-container (6.0.10), which was released the 07-Sep-2025 (in no-subscription). Best regards,
-
UdoB replied to the thread Is clustering production-ready on Proxmox VE 8.2.2?.Yes, you are (or course) correct. Note that I do admit that although I am using ZFS exclusively - the few clusters I have are small. With that number of nodes ZFS-replication (over all nodes) would be a bad choice. And partial replication -let's...
-
UdoB reacted to LnxBil's post in the thread Is clustering production-ready on Proxmox VE 8.2.2? with Like.
Managing ZFS replication with multiple nodes is a PITA and the pain scales with the number of nodes and machines. Just go with shared storage. This will yield a much better cluster experience. For me, a "real" cluster requires a (dedicated or...
-
UdoB reacted to czechsys's post in the thread Is clustering production-ready on Proxmox VE 8.2.2? with Like.
Don't use 8.2.2. You will have problem install another host with this version. Use last PVE version, now 8.4, or go directly to 9.
-
zfs set com.sun:auto-snapshot=false tank
-
UdoB replied to the thread [SOLVED] Disable ZFS autosnapshot for a pool.Each tool has it own benefits. But yes, I am using cv4pve for exactly that reason. While I am absolutely able to handle Desaster recovery with naked replicated snapshots the integration in the PVE logic and in the GUI is really convenient! The...
-
UdoB reacted to floh8's post in the thread [Pathfinder4DIY] PVE and high performance ZFS-over-ISCSI Storage with High-Availability (Active/Passiv) via TCP or RDMA on commodity HW with Like.
!!! 1.Hint: This Thread is not for Ceph fan boys. Go away! !!!! Occasion: In the Thread "Vote for Feature in ZFS-over-ISCSI" my one (the word "one" is always related to a human being, not a matter or person or number) had to put question marks...
-
UdoB reacted to cypherfox's post in the thread I can't see backups in the webapp, but files exist... with Like.
Circling back around on this, the answer is...yes, it was a 'too much data' problem. Setting a pretty wide net of prune (keeping around 50 snapshots over time per VM, around 2,000 snapshots currently) cleared ~95,000 snapshots, and the subsequent...
-
UdoB reacted to Kurgan's post in the thread PBS integrity check: is the hash computed on PVE or on PBS? with Like.
Thanks a lot for the explanation, it's very clear and I like the fact that this protects the best part of the backup chain of hardware and software. This means that if the PVE host does not corrupt data, then any further corruption, even in the...
-
My grub was messed up after upgrading, so I did a liveboot to mount the root volume and boot, then reinstalled and updated grub and I was back. # find your root and boot by looking at your partitions, mine looked like this lsblk NAME...
-
UdoB reacted to mr44er's post in the thread Server Upgrade - Unterstützung/Beratung bei Auswahl der Hardware with Like.
Wahrscheinlich, aber richtig gut kann ich dir zu dem Modell nichts sagen, da müsstest du hier mal nach Beiträgen von anderen suchen. Bei Micron weiß ich wenigstens, dass ich das firmware-binary bekomme und auch unter Proxmox direkt flashen kann...
-
UdoB replied to the thread PBS integrity check: is the hash computed on PVE or on PBS?.It is (first) calculated on PVE. Then this checksum is transmitted to PBS - only the checksum, no data. If a chunk with that checksum already exists on PBS then some references are updated to reflect this new backup. Only if that checksum is...