Recent content by sannsio

Hi, I put this domain in the blacklist (Mail Filter -> Who Object -> Blacklist) "news.progressiverailroading.com" But I still receive emails from this domain: Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 12:32:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID...

Thanks Stoiko, yes, this helps! Sanni

Hi Folks, I want to build a Proxmox Mail Gateways Cluster. Can someone tell me which ports/protocols are being used when one node joins another node? Thanks, Sanni

you saved my day, thanks!

Thank you Stoiko, I understand! I can also add domain names and e-mail addresses there. What effect will it have? Best regards, Sandra

Hi! I have a question concerning whitelisting. I put the domain xxx.com in the whitelist (Menu: Configuration > Mail Proxy > Whitelist). But Mails from this domain still get blocked by a DNSBL: Apr 21 16:15:49 pmg1 postfix/postscreen[2399]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [40.107.6.63]:12207: 550...

Ok, thanks. Unfortunately there is no entry in my fstab for any mount: root@pve1:/etc/pve# cat /etc/fstab # <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass> /dev/pve/root / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/pve/swap none swap sw 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 Can I just umount...

I removed the storage in the the Storage section within the UI by clicking "Remove". The NFS storage has been removed from the fiel /etc/pve/storage.cfg immediately.

Hi! I have set up a NFS storage in my Proxmox Cluster. I now removed it, but the NFS share is still mounted on all the nodes: 192.168.1.235:/srv/nfs on /mnt/pve/NFSTest type nfs4...

I will try the active-passive bonding method. I think in small separated segments like a storage network, it is a good solution. Maybe bridging is the better approach when connecting servers to a wider network segment were STP is in place? Don't know... Maybe someone else here can add his...

Hey, thanks for your feedback! Sounds promising :) Have you also been using Linux Bridges for redundancy? I was reading about it and some people are saying that using bridges connected to multiple switches (using spanning tree) is the better solution than active-backup bonding. Cheers, Sandra

Hi, I would like to implement more redundancy to my pve/ceph cluster. The storage runs in a separate 10 Gbit network. I was thinking to add a second 10 Gbit switch and connect the serves NIC's to each of them using bonding with active-backup mode. Is it advisable to do that? Is active-passive...

Thanks guys, I don't have the connection yet. The Ceph docs say: "If your data centers have dedicated bandwidth and low latency, you can distribute your cluster across data centers easily. If you use a WAN over the Internet, you may need to configure Ceph to ensure effective peering...

Hi everybody, we are running a 7 Node Proxmox Cluster. 3 Nodes are used for Ceph only. We are considering to rent a second rack at another data center and run the same set up for the case of a disaster in our primary data center. Now it came to my mind that Proxmox provides High Availability...