Hey everyone
Just a quick update from my side regarding the topic and my post above (#30).
I’ve been continuing to work on this idea and published it as PBS_Chunk_Checker.
The script has now been completely rewritten in Python, which gave it...
@Stoiko Ivanov , as i also have struggled hours with this, too - could we perhaps make lsblk perhaps make more "robust" against failure like the above, if the param which defines the access order for lsblk is changed and blkid is being used...
mh. came across this one. but for me , it doesn't even work after using "reset" in efi bios
https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2599
i'm out of ideas.
setting in grub cmdline to
kern.vt.fb.default_mode=1024x786
or...
@t.lamprecht @giner , i have created a reproducer for the issue to make this happen without O_DIRECT write by user - but just by accessing memory and make system swap/thrash
i have done so because there wer some complaints that "you aren't...
Hello,
i use proxmox from macbook retina, which has very high display resolution.
i setup uefi vm to check some details of XCP-ng hypervisor, but though i set display resolution to 1024x768 in uefi bios settings of VM (Device Manager -> OVMF...
ok. i should stop wasting my time by digging into issues with totally outdated proxmox versions....
https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20210706095026.3785241-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/
maybe
yes | pvesh create .....
is worth a try?
not sure, if pve9 made a progress with this issue, as i don't know how to reproduce this one.
anyhow, i searched a bit and that "PMBR signature detected" message seems to originate from...
kernelnewbies generally has a good list (ie https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.17 https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.16 and https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.15), no need to use an LLM here.
An opt-in 6.17 kernel is available now: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/opt-in-linux-6-17-kernel-for-proxmox-ve-9-available-on-test-no-subscription.173920/
We recently uploaded the 6.17 kernel to our repositories. The current default kernel for the Proxmox VE 9 series is still 6.14, but 6.17 is now an option.
We plan to use the 6.17 kernel as the new default for the Proxmox VE 9.1 release later in...
You use any 2 nodes (pve internal or external) for redundant storage representation and use all (or all others) pve nodes just as clients for vm/lxc images.
Even though Linus Torvalds decided not to include it in 6.17, you could also try compiling it in the kernel yourself, like how Proxmox compiles in ZFS. Although after a quick Google search, It seems that it is not something for the faint of...
it seems there is no mention about the pve clustering - just setting up the drbd mirroring. so i have difficulties in understanding how this can work, as we need three nodes minimum with proxmox pve.
yes, but i don't want to test something which is at "experimental" state with totally outdated version and old/resolved bugs, so i'd like to use recent dkms version as announced at https://www.patreon.com/posts/dkms-migration-139949871