Recent content by PanZvedavy

Please add permissions level on target hosts needed for PDM to a PDM documentation: a) for maximum PDM functionality = PDM-max b) for minimum functionality = PDM-min Or even better! add PDM roles directly to PVE and PBS so users wont need to elaborate what exactly is needed. And as development...

Bingo!, {$PVE.URL.HOST} it is. Especialy usefull, when you monitor zabbix agent on PVE through proxy...

Well, I get you point with fidling with updates inside of vms. My primary idea was with web interface for POM having a simple one page, somewhere in administration section as submenu, with ability to manage repos..adding them, delete them, manage snapshots etc. Maybe after some time you will add...

Are there any plans to incorporate this feature into proxmox web interface? It would by a great addition to have something like linux WSUS for its hosts and virtuals. For standartisation and wider comunnity akceptance, this would need to have graphic administration.

Well, I understand this, but what I would like to know is, if there is some real performance advantage with LXC over KVM. In theory yes, but I would like to hear from somebody with real life expirience with this. Im running KVM only for security reasons and for switching to LXC in MariaDB case...

To risky and not so simple in my use case scenario, having proxmox as gw-firewall(on proxmox host), mdraid 1 with virtuals, freenas virtual with XXTB of data, etc...all in one box, so not a typical installation. I need separate HW, where I can test new version, see how it behave, whats different...

Uf, v.5 at the end of the support. Hm. Any estimation on v7 release time? I would like to skip v6 in order not to going over again through manual install on full encrypted debian with md raid1. Also any plans for implementing full encryption options of proxmox host to default proxmox...

Hello, Im just planing new MariaDB VM and trying to find out, if there is any performance advantage for using LXC container for DB server virtualisation over KVM. Any suggestions?

He ment running proxmox 3.4 inside kvm which will run on proxmox 4.x host...

Well , I didnt thought about this option, but nested virtualization is possible if you have proper hw for that. My version is, that you install proxmox 4.x and create one full kvm and inside that kvm you will run all of your openVZ instances. Inside kvm you can use any implementation of openVZ...

Simply install one full kvm virtual on proxmox and then run openvz containers from inside that virtual. Simple, quick and clean solution for your needs.

You cannot extend already created ZFS pool. ZFS dont have this funkcionality. You must backup you data on current pool, destroy it, and recreate it from scratch with added disks. Linux SW raid is definitely not like ZFS. Its like comparing bike with mercedes :}

Thank you, sir. We will hope for the best :)

well that was exhaustive answer....anyway....... Can we get some statement about this from proxmox team? Do you plan such a feature or not? THX.

Well barebone host is not supported scenario by proxmox team. And its not only about adding encryption options to installer. Also adding encryption function set to web administration. When you add new storage, there should be a some encryption options. And this leads to function like ability to...