This is not a big cluster,but i usually recommend to my clients to split clusters into something like 15-20 nodes if they are unsure about stability of it.
You now how PDM, live migration works good.
7.0 is a test kernel,not an enterprise kernel atm, so if you are okay with breakages you use this kernel. If not, you usually pay for enterprise subscription.
Why would you be angry on a company giving you a test repo?
Did you try 7.0 kernel?
sudo modprobe tcp_bbr
sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control
On 7.0 i get:
net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control = reno cubic bbr
First!
Just kidding, tested with one physical atm, works okay.
Linux SPS2 7.0.0-1-rc6-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 7.0.0-1~rc6+1 (2026-03-30T09:17Z) x86_64 GNU/Linux
CEPH in Proxmox is the endgame, but as they said,if you really don't need that type of HA(or even real HA), you could go with storage replication. It works good, manual failover is fairly quick and with backups you're good.
Well,if you store Netflow that much(multi-TB usually), then it makes sense that db is in a multiple VM's ,and then maybe you can create a different storage on a same PBS with a different namespace. Atleast that is how i do it with NFA.