Search results

Yes, independent means one connection cannot saturate whole network.

Create two independent networks for SAN/NFS, one for data and one for backups. That is atleast start.

Did you try 7.0 kernel? sudo modprobe tcp_bbr sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control On 7.0 i get: net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control = reno cubic bbr

First! Just kidding, tested with one physical atm, works okay. Linux SPS2 7.0.0-1-rc6-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 7.0.0-1~rc6+1 (2026-03-30T09:17Z) x86_64 GNU/Linux

CEPH in Proxmox is the endgame, but as they said,if you really don't need that type of HA(or even real HA), you could go with storage replication. It works good, manual failover is fairly quick and with backups you're good.

I cannot imagine manager who said "let's use test repo", and then blames everyone else on that decision.

Yes, implement third DC with quorum device with like 3 votes can be effective.

For CEPH homelab you only need 2.5g,5g or at most 10g. So only calculate that, the cores and everything isnt that important for the homelab.

Well,if you store Netflow that much(multi-TB usually), then it makes sense that db is in a multiple VM's ,and then maybe you can create a different storage on a same PBS with a different namespace. Atleast that is how i do it with NFA.

I would usually recommend something like mergefs or bcachefs in this case,certainly not zfs.

Yes,it basically copies state of ct or vm onto a different zfs pool, the docs are really good and simple.

You probably shouldn't use proxmox logo,since it is a trademark.

If you need something like AfterEffects inside vm you can use max as cpu type.

For my customers we are using rds farm + fslogic on CEPH tbh, not on local disks. Try changing cpu type to something instead of host. Also maybe screenshots of load and io of the VM,maybe you have something like I/O stall?

I use for some testing those nested snapshots(testing different versions of some app), and i haven't found a reliable way to migrate or backup those snapshots.

Yeah i have 2x these nvmes are depending on case and ventilation,they can go up to 90c and restart.

Usually i don't agree with that,because i've had customers on 3-node CEPH/Proxmox for more than 3-4 years without a hiccup (not counting power errors,etc). And nowadays, with proxmox it is everything batteries included, only thing admin needs to know about it a little bit of linux,bit of...

Usually i ask for netstat -sanu to see what can be optimized in kernel and system.

I don;t agree that the ceph learning curve is steep. Read the docs, get the right network(i would say everything else but this is primary),and start working with it. There are rarely problems, if we count out physical layer problems.

Ooh, consumer crucial, not good, not good.