Recent content by Marcin Kubica

Yes, and this makes it virtually unusable. If you guys could add full text search it would be cool. Thanks!

this goes back to the race conditions when mass requesting vm. if you look how this has been done in virtualbox, they have perfectly worked around this issue by not dropping vm id management on the client

No, name stays the name, and assigning an id is to be managed by proxmox. This relieves clients from the work a cluster should do in an enterprise environment.

Well in this use case, client must provide a name for vm, so calls for new_vm with name "bla". The connection gets lost and client doesn't know. Client calls again to /new_vm name "bla", server would respond "bla" exists.

Sounds good. Gonna try it. Why not let proxmox engine do this as an option?

Ok, but hat's a homelab use case. Again, sadly it's a homelab use case making Proxmox not fit for a scalable enterprise solution. (and already available since the beginning of time in kvm)

Heya How do you go about race conditions when requesting to create VMs from different "callers"? It seems Proxmox is unable to assign vmid by itself and it always needs to be supplied, and the best guess is to ask for next free vmid. However, in anything larger than homelab in case of...

I mean I need a set of VMs running on the same host, all having networking within the set, but not with VMs in the other set. Maybe, and SDN looks very neat, however, I need a stable (non-beta) solution at the moment. btw. any chance you guys could fix the search capabilities in API search...

Heya I have a use case for isolating networks for a set of VMs bridged to loopback as vmbr. As to the frequency of checking it might be once or hundreds of times per day. Wondering how to otherwise address such isolation dynamically.

Heya Anyone could help me find what call can return all used VLANs (tags) across the cluster? API doc search seems to not work. I've tried browsing but likely missed it. Also, is there an option for tag same as next free vmid?

Works via qemu. Proxmox 5 doesn't even recognise net0 on UI. https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking#How_to_get_SSH_access_to_a_guest

Hi @spirit , SDN looks really promising. Do you think it will support port nat functionality per VM like virtualbox can? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/vbox-port-forward-migrate-to-proxmox-isolated-networks.71998/

Hi All I'm trying to think about best way to approach dynamic port forwarding to VMs. In Virtual Box this is really super easy - port forwarding is simply a part of VM definition, and their process is just spawning a listening socket for the VM process. This means with a little code I can spawn...

Thanks! Best regards

Thanks @Alwin Is this really ceph issue? I know of ceph deployments off-proxmox and they work well with long hostnames of even 50 characters long. You sure this is not pveceph wrapper / perl lib? Best Marcin